There probably aren't statistics for the whole country, but a judgment not withstanding, such an occurrence is rare.
Judges overturn jury verdicts infrequently, as they typically defer to the jury's decision. However, in cases where there is a legal error or misconduct, a judge may overturn a jury verdict.
A verdict is given by a trier of facts, which is either the Judge or a jury. The Deputy Clerk of the Court in which the trial was held often is the one who reads the verdict out loud (called publishing the verdict).
Technically, the jury renders the verdict in a jury trial, then the judge signs the written judgment based on the verdict. If the case is tried without a jury (a bench trial) the judge as the finder of fact renders the verdict and signs the appropriate written judgment.Additional: If the questioner is asking who it is that actually delivers (i.e.: first speaks) the verdict out loud; as stated above, in a bench trial the judge will deliver it, but in jury trials it can vary depending on the practice of the court and jurisdiction in which it is located. In some courts the jury foreperson will deliver the verdict, while in others the foreperson surrenders the verdict sheet to the Bailiff who delivers it to the judge who reads it and then hands it to the Court Clerk to actually be read aloud into the record .
Often-times the sentencing hearing is not until after the verdict has been delivered. It gives the judge time to commission and study a background check of the defendant to see exactly what type of sentence may fit the offense of which they were convicted.
There usually isn't a script which judges are required to follow. Often a judge will have written their own script, which they will have memorized, for what to say. Most commonly, this runs along the lines of: "Mr. Foreman, has the jury reached a verdict?" (Yes, your honor.) "Please read that verdict before the court." The judge could say just about anything they wanted - the important part is that he asks the jury to speak the verdict aloud so that it is part of the record.
A fast verdict in legal proceedings typically indicates that the jury or judge has reached a decision quickly, often suggesting a clear and decisive outcome based on the evidence presented.
Most criminal cases result in a plea bargain or trial verdict, while civil cases often settle out of court. Ultimately, the outcome depends on the available evidence, legal arguments, and decisions made by the parties involved.
A quick verdict in a legal context typically indicates that the jury or judge has reached a decision swiftly, often suggesting a strong consensus on the guilt or innocence of the accused.
In a bench trial, a judge serves as the sole decision-maker, evaluating the evidence and determining the verdict without a jury. This type of trial is often preferred for its efficiency and the judge's expertise in legal matters. The judge not only rules on the admissibility of evidence but also interprets the law and applies it to the facts of the case. Bench trials are common in civil cases and some criminal cases where the parties waive their right to a jury trial.
A fast verdict in legal proceedings typically signifies that the jury or judge has reached a decision quickly, often indicating a clear and strong case for one side. It can suggest that the evidence presented was compelling and the outcome was apparent.
In the US, a magistrate does not have the authority to overturn a trial court judges' ruling. If there was a trial and the Judge made an error, you can appeal within a certain amount of time. You would appeal to the state Appellate Court or Supreme Court, depending on how the state's courts are organized. However, not liking the trial judge's ruling is not grounds for appeal. There must be a legitimate legal basis, such as misapplication of the law. If you believe you have grounds for appeal, you should speak with your lawyer immediately.
It is often used in cases of probation when the final verdict (adjudication) in the case is withheld pending the completion of a court ordered requirement of the defendant. If the task (whatever it is) is successfully completed the judge MAY render a lesser or more lenient verdict than what was originally anticipated.