According to DODI 8510.01 (DIACAP), paragraph 4.9:"All DoD ISs with an authorization to operate (ATO) shall be reviewed annually to confirm that the IA posture of the IS remains acceptable. Reviews will include validation of IA controls and be documented in writing."Note that in the case of a MAC I system, the reviews should occur semi-annually, i.e. every six months.
For US DoD systems: under DIACAP, the IA posture of an organization should be reviewed at least annually. All systems must undergo a complete review at least every 3 years but should also undergo at least a partial review every year (annual security review). More sensitive and more critical systems may be required to undergo review more often - some as often as every 6 months. NIST recommends pretty much the same.
FalseThe relevant DoD Instruction is DoDI 8500.2, but it should be noted that the IA posture must be reviewed at least once a year, not just every two years.DoDI 8510.2 (DIACAP) also cites DoDI 8500.2, which requires that the IA posture of all systems belonging to an organization must be reviewed at least once a year.Furthermore, the system must be assessed and undergo reaccreditation by the Principal Accredditation Authority (PAA) - which generally means the DAA - at least every 3 years.
There is NO DoD instruction that states that IA posture gets reviewed every two years; the relevant DoD Instruction is DoDI 8500.2, but it states that the IA posture must be reviewed at least once a year, not just every two years.DoDI 8510.2 (DIACAP) also cites DoDI 8500.2, which requires that the IA posture of all systems belonging to an organization must be reviewed at least once a year.Furthermore, the system must be assessed and undergo reaccreditation by the Principal Accredditation Authority (PAA) - which generally means the DAA - at least every 3 years.
The short answer is - YES. Both the IAM and the IAO have responsibilities in implementing DIACAP. Table E3.A1.T1 of DoDI 8500.2 states that the System Identification Profile must list the members of the DIACAP team, to wit: Identify the DIACAP Team (e.g., DAA, the CA, the DoD IS PM or SM, the DoD IS IAM, IAO, and UR. Note that BOTH the IAM and IAO are listed. The acronym IASO is synonymous with IAO.
Identify some posture and resistance constants of an effective resistance posture
His bad posture has been causing him back pains.Your posture needs correcting.
Jim, as part of the organization's Identity and Access Management (IAM) team, should clarify his role and responsibilities regarding DIACAP implementation. If he is not required to assist the Program Manager, he should communicate this to ensure expectations are aligned. Additionally, he could suggest an appropriate resource or team that specializes in DIACAP to support the Program Manager effectively. It’s important for Jim to document this communication for future reference.
when typing, you should have a straight posture.
Jim, your organizations IAM, has been contacted by the Program Manager to assist in implementing the DIACAP. Jim is not required to assist the PM in this activity, and should pass this activity off to the IAO (or IASO).
This question is now outdated since the DoD has moved to RMF as their accreditation mechanism. Under RMF the team members should include the AO (authorizing official), CA (certification authority), system owner, and user representative.
They should review the BBP standards.