One should respond to an unjust law through peaceful resistance, advocacy, and dialogue, aiming to raise awareness about its unfairness. Engaging in civil disobedience can be a powerful means of demonstrating the law's moral shortcomings, as long as it is done nonviolently and with an understanding of potential consequences. Additionally, seeking legal challenges and mobilizing public support can help bring about change. Ultimately, the goal should be to promote justice and uphold human rights.
Try one of the related links below .
Yes, it is. Any law, no matter how just or unjust, is held to be legally enforceable. To break one, even for good reasons, is illegal.
Unjust enrichment means that one party was enriched wrongfully at the expense of another party. While some states do not allow unjust enrichment as a cause of action by itself, states that do, and Federal Law, generally adhere to the requirement that the following factors be proved for a case of unjust enrichment: 1. An enrichment 2. An impoverishment 3. A connection between enrichment and the impoverishment 4. Absence of a justification for the enrichment and impoverishment 5. An absence of a remedy provided by the law
One example of an unjust law is the fact that homosexuals still cannot get married in some states within the US. Another example of an unjust law is the CISPA law, which violates US citizens privacy.
"One has not only legal but moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws."and... "Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust."These are not the only two within the letter, but just the two I saw first.
Henry David Thoreau broke the law by refusing to pay taxes because he believed it supported unjust institutions like slavery and the Mexican-American War. He wanted to protest these injustices and demonstrate his commitment to civil disobedience as a form of protest against an unjust government.
NO... Most scenario may have a loop hole in it that it justifies the "braking" of that law ... If the law is an unjust one ... then you have a morale and constructional right to not abide by it ... there are other scenarios that are more comical then profound that permits the "braking" of said law ...
Are women unjust to men. Generalities are never wholly true. Including that last one.
In his "Letter from Birmingham Jail," Martin Luther King Jr. defines just laws as those that align with moral law or the law of God, promoting human dignity and equality, while unjust laws are those that degrade human personality and are out of harmony with moral law. He counters the view that one should obey laws simply because they exist, arguing that individuals have a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. By highlighting the immorality of certain laws, King incentivizes his readers to take action against injustice, encouraging nonviolent resistance as a means to achieve social change. This framing empowers individuals to challenge the status quo and advocate for justice.
You are confusing Law and Morality (or Ethics). A law may or may not be "just" -- that's your ethical judgment about it. Your question cannot be answered: one man gathers what another man spills. A law abiding citizen breaks no laws, by definition. It is part of our collective social contract that we abide by the law, whether we agree with it or not, or even if we know what it is. If one doesn't like a law, he or she should seek to change it, through political activity. Some laws are solid -- the vast majority of people are in agreement with them -- others are sketchy -- less people are in agreement. These things shift over time. Different people will find different laws just or unjust, or even the same law in a different situation . . . . Is it wrong to steal? Yes. Is it wrong to steal if your child is starving and there is simply no other way for you to get him or her food? I don't know.
An action is considered racially unjust when it discriminates against individuals based on their race or ethnicity, reinforcing systems of oppression and inequality. This can manifest through unequal treatment, limited opportunities, or biased policies that disadvantage certain racial groups.
Trick or treat