answersLogoWhite

0

Equity was introduced into law as a response to the rigidities and shortcomings of common law in medieval England. When individuals sought remedies that common law could not provide, they petitioned the king for justice, leading to the establishment of the Court of Chancery. This court applied principles of fairness and moral justice, allowing for more flexible remedies such as injunctions and specific performance. Over time, equity became a distinct body of law that complemented common law, addressing issues of fairness and providing relief in cases where strict legal rules were inadequate.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is doctrine of equity in received law?

what is doctrine of equity


Difference between common law and equity?

common law also make by artificially and equity make atumetically


When common law and equity conflicts what prevails what is the historical reson?

In cases where common law and equity conflict, equity prevails. This principle was established to ensure fairness and justice in legal disputes. It originated from the historical separation between courts of law and courts of equity in England, where equity developed to provide remedies when the strict application of common law would lead to injustice.


Which unwritten branch of law supplements the common law?

Equity law


What has the author Harold Greville Hanbury written?

Harold Greville Hanbury has written: 'Hanbury and Maudsley Modern equity' -- subject(s): Equity 'Modern equity, the principles of equity' -- subject(s): Equity 'The Vinerian Chair and legal education' -- subject(s): Biography, History, Law, Oxford, Oxford. University. Vinerian Chair of English Law, Study and teaching, University of Oxford, University of Oxford. Vinerian Chair of English Law 'Essays in equity' -- subject(s): Study and teaching, Roman law, Equity


What is a law called when it is introduced to Congress?

a law is called a bill when it is introduced to congress


When law and equity conflict which prevails?

In general, the law prevails over equity unless the circumstances are such that a manifest injustice would result. The maxim at common law is: "Equity follows the law." This means two things. One is that whenever there is an adequate remedy at law, legal relief rather than equitable relief should be provided. The second is that if the law on a subject is explicit, equity does not supersede it. Equity law developed out of a sense of fairness when the law courts could not grant relief that adequately compensated a party for a loss or harm. Since resort was made to equity only when there was no adequate provision in law, the rule became that courts look to the law first, then to equity.


What has the author George E Gardner written?

George E. Gardner has written: 'A review in law and equity for law students' -- subject(s): Equity, Law, Outlines, syllabi


'Equity is irrelevant in the modern world'Discuss?

Equity and common law existed after the norman conquest in 1066


Who introduced the sunset law in India?

Lord Cornwallis introduced the 'Sunset Law' in India while he introduced his Permanent Settlement.


When and who introduced remedies for breach of contract?

The answer to this question may vary depending on your jurisdiction. In general, at common law, breach of contract remedies come in two flavor: legal, and equitable. Equitable remedies evolved through the Courts of Equity (shock!) in England; legal through the Courts of Law. To grossly oversimplify, the court of law is based upon the written laws and statutes; the courts of equity, on what is "fair." The remedies were introduced over literally hundreds of years by a number of legislative bodies and courts. By comparison, most states in the United States provided breach of contract remedies in their statutes. You can actually look up each statute and see who introduced it, and when.


What is common law and equity?

Common law is a body of legal precedent compiled by past court decisions. These decisions become the rules that common law judges use to decide legal disputes. Courts of equity provide a remedy when common law courts decide a case constitutes an inequitable situation. The common law court determines things are legally unbalanced between two parties; the court of equity provides equalizing relief. Equity to common law tends to reduce any injustice caused by the strict application of the common law and mitigates