The classical theory can prevent crime because it argues that crime which occurs due to forces of the world is aggravated by the absence of effective punishment, and therefore with effective punishment, criminals who are rational, will want to minimize pain, and maximize pleasure.
Statistically
arachnaphobia
David Ricardo
no because it is more descriptive, so it would be an adjective.
david ricardo-appex
A Functionalist might view the Prohibition Era as an attempt to promote social order by reducing alcohol-related crime and improving public health. A Conflict Theorist might see it as a tool of social control by powerful groups to restrict the behavior of marginalized communities. An Interactionist might focus on how prohibition influenced social interactions, such as speakeasies providing spaces for people to socialize outside the law.
A conflict theorist would view racism as a way for dominant groups to maintain power and control over marginalized groups. They would argue that racism creates social inequalities by allowing those in power to justify their privileged positions and oppress others based on race. Conflict theorists would advocate for dismantling systemic racism to address these power imbalances.
A classical Pentecostal church would be the Assembly of God Church.
As the lit review should be part of the introduction, I would recommend it.
Commit a crime
Then it would be crime because it would be acceptable. the only thing that makes something a crime is that you will get punished for it. if there are no consequences then it will not be considered a crime because everyone will be doing it. :)
classical