An argument that debates whether or not something is right or wrong
Lincoln-Douglas (LD) is centered around values. Cases typically have a value premise, value criterion, and multiple contentions. The value premise is a way of judging the resolution (such as justice or national security). The value criterion is how the case's contentions achieve the value premise (such as utilitarianism or the Rawlsian veil of ignorance). The contentions are a case's main arguments. Philosophy and analytical arguments should play a heavy role in an LD debate.
elements that is not necessary to prevent value conflicts in the work place?
A value conflict exists when there is a clash between two or more competing values or beliefs that individuals or groups hold. This conflict arises when people must make choices that force them to prioritize one value over another, leading to feelings of moral or ethical dilemma. Resolving value conflicts often requires reflection, negotiation, and compromise to find a solution that aligns with the core values of all parties involved.
One source of value conflict in administrative agencies can be differences in ethical standards and priorities among staff members. Additionally, conflicting interpretations of laws or regulations by different agencies can lead to value conflicts. Finally, competing stakeholder interests, such as those of the public, industry, and government, can also create value conflicts within administrative agencies.
long term value
news value - APEX ;)
Conflict trigger events are specific incidents or situations that can escalate tensions or disagreements between individuals or groups. These events can range from miscommunication to more serious disagreements over value differences or resource allocation, leading to a conflict. Identifying and addressing conflict trigger events can help prevent conflicts from escalating.
Freedom
Carmel Antoinette Sheehan has written: 'Role conflict and value divergence in sister administrators' -- subject(s): Role conflict, Values, Nuns as public school teachers
The paradox of value refers to the conflict between the high value of essential goods like water for survival and the low value of non-essential goods like diamonds. This paradox challenges traditional economic theories that value is based solely on scarcity and utility, highlighting the subjective nature of value.
Most, but especially any of the bottom two rows.