That would be a partnership agreement.That would be a partnership agreement.That would be a partnership agreement.That would be a partnership agreement.
A general partnership would not be as close knit as the limited partnership. There also would not be as many legal proceedings to go with it.
A type of partnership that is not a partnership would be one that does not involve business.
Yes, a partnership can be a stockholder in a corporation. In this case, the partnership would typically hold shares in the corporation as an entity, rather than individual partners holding shares personally. The partnership's ownership interest would be represented by the shares it holds, and any distributions or profits would be allocated according to the partnership agreement.
I would suggest establishing linkages of both private abd public partnership in order to promote tourism and to give awareness to people around the world about the country and what it can offer.
Generally, no. The partners would hold 'equal shares', however, some other split may be agreed upon which would be in the Partnership Agreement.
Partnership
This is a non sequitur. A will disposes of property in a testator's probate estate, which presumably would include the testator's interest in the partnership. The partnership agreement governs the assets owned by the partnership. The will governs assets in the probat estate.
This would be called a partnership.
The advantages of a partnership is that you would have someone else to share the burden with. They would also be responsible for half of everything, whether good or bad.
A partnership does not automatically dissolve if a partner is deemed incompetent. The partnership documents should state the procedure if one partner becomes incapacitated for any reason, which would include incompetency.
The best word for this would be com-pàirt.