No, not unless there is new evidence. To retry a person for a crime who has all ready been found guilty or innocent is double jeopardy and not allowed under the constitution.
The four pleas a defendant may use in a criminal case are guilty, not guilty, guilty but mentally ill, and nolo contendere (no contest). A defendant who pleads guilty admits their responsibility for the crime. Pleading not guilty indicates that the defendant denies the charges and intends to contest them. A guilty but mentally ill plea acknowledges guilt but asserts that the defendant had a mental illness at the time of the offense. A nolo contendere plea means the defendant does not contest the charges but does not admit guilt.
Yes. A mistrial means that the first trial never took place so double jeopardy is not an issue. It is only when a judge dismisses a case with prejudice or one is found not guilty in a trial that the defendant cannot be retried for the same crime.
Overwhelmingly obvious proof (evidence) of the offense would lead a guilty defendant to just go ahead and plead to the charge.
Under the protection against double jeopardy, the defendant cannot be retried for the same crime for which he was found not guilty. He can, however, be charged with other (distinct) crimes committed in the same instance.
The judge is required by law to sentence a charge for the defendant is found guilty of. When defendant is found guilty of multiple felony convictions, the must be sentenced for each one.
Co-defendants can be sentenced differently. They do not have to all be found guilty or not guilty.
The defendant is not guilty of the crime they are accused of.
In a criminal case, a charge is the specific criminal act that the accused is alleged to have committed. For example, a person could be charged with murder or possession of a controlled substance. A plea is the defendant's formal response. Typically, the defendant can plead guilty or not guilty, and sometimes nolo contendre.
the defendant pleads guilty
It sounds from the question, as if the defendant was charged for TWO offenses. The one for which he was arrested, and the obstruction charge (when he apparently 'resisted' the arrest). . The question indicates that he was found not guilty of the original arrest charge, but WAS found guilty of obstructing the officer.
Guilty with explanation.An affirmative defense: a defense to a criminal charge in which the defendant generally admits doing the criminal act but claims an affirmative defense such as duress (he or she was forced) or entrapment. In effect, an affirmative defense says, "Yes, I did it, but I had a good reason."ReferencesGardner, T. J., & Anderson, T. M. (2008). Criminal law. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
No, this is a procedure used in criminal court when the prosecutor tries to get the defendant to plead guilty to the charge in order to get a lesser charge than a maximum sentence.