It means that the court and/or the prosecutor decided that no legal 'good' would be served by continuing the case forward. If it was your case that was dsmissed, consider yourself lucky - you got a pass.
Deferred adjudication is a type of plea agreement where a defendant pleads guilty or no contest, but sentencing is deferred while the defendant completes a probationary period. If the defendant successfully completes probation, the charges may be dismissed and the defendant may be eligible to have the record sealed or expunged.
How long does it take to process secret clearance adjudication by Dept of Homeland Security and Dept of Justice.?
Centrized adjudication.
Kojak - 1973 Justice Deferred 3-22 was released on: USA: 22 February 1976 Germany: 4 October 1991
It "sounds" like you are quoting some kind of "short-hand" notation written on a court paper or the court file. To me. it appears that what is being conveyed is: "Case Dismissed in the Furtherance of Justice." If this is correct, it is important that you determine if the case was dismissed WITH or WITHOUT prejudice.
In the interest of justice is a way that courts dismiss cases where the accused are ill, elderly, or for some other humanitarian reason. It is believed that justice is not served in these cases.
Ruth Donner has written: 'International adjudication' -- subject(s): Foreign relations, International Court of Justice, Jurisdiction (International law)
to promote the interest of consumer
Alternatives to plea bargaining in the criminal justice system include going to trial, participating in mediation or arbitration, and seeking a deferred prosecution or pretrial diversion program.
justice p.n.bhagwati
Eileen M. Garry has written: 'Improving the adjudication process' -- subject(s): Administration of Criminal justice, Bibliography, Court administration, Criminal courts, National Institute of Justice (U.S.) 'Responsible fatherhood' -- subject(s): Father and child, Juvenile delinquency
In Book I of The Republic, Socrates and Thrasymachus try to define justice. Socrates argues that justice is inherently good and involves being virtuous and ethical, while Thrasymachus believes that justice is merely the interest of the stronger, advocating for self-interest and power dynamics in defining what is just.