The police officer is simply there to take the statement not to say whos At Fault. The insurance company will decide who is at fault. Normally they will find that one one is at fault if no one admits fault. The case will simply be a dud. Neither party will get paid and each will have to cover the cost of the accident.
Fault is typically determined by police reports and accident witness(es). In a rear end accident the vehicle striking another in the rear is typically at fault. With multiple cars it is up to the reporting police officer to determine fault.
No Fault means just that. No Fault. However, you could both be cited for the accident, it will have to be determined in Traffic Court by a judge. If they are at fault, the police officer will issue a ticket. No fault insurance doesn't refer to the legality of the accident, only the compensation.
If a police officer is involved in an accident while working and is at fault, the accident should be reported by another officer. There are no differences in the accident reports made with an officer involved in an accident. Any questions regarding a lawsuit against the officer should be asked directly to a lawyer.
was it your fault or the cops? If it was your fault and you know it, be honest and own up to it. A Police officer has greater resources to bring you to justice than other drivers. If it was the cops fault, have as many witnesses as possible and get pictures. If he is an honest cop, you should have no problem, if he isn't, you may have a long fight on your hands.
Insurance companies determine fault by looking at police reports, taking statements from the parties involved and witnesses, and looking at the vehicles.
In most states fault is determined by the police officer responding to the scene of an accident. Depending on the state a missing sign at an intersection may be considered a 4-way stop. Instances like these may require the expertise of a lawyer and possible accident reconstruction. Witnesses also weigh heavily in helping to determine fault.
The fact that they were a police officer has little to do with the accident unless they had their lights on and were responding to a call. Otherwise, fault will pay for damages. That's all.
If you are both moving, the one at fault is whoever the police officer says is at fault on the accident report. That's all I can tell you with this information. I hope you called the police. They will say you backed into them and you will say they ran into you. Without a police report faulting one of you, the insurance company will say both are 50% at fault which means each pays for their own damage.
You should find evidence or witnesses from the accident to give proof (testify) that the accident was not your fault. You could also go to court...
Nothing, you are at fault. If you were implying that since they didn't see you, they can't prove it was you, then the obvious proof is in the damaged vehicles and with any witnesses. Just don't admit fault, let the police do that and the insurance companies can fight it out.
Police don't always determine the fault especially the private property incidents. What the police report usually does is tell the facts of what happened and what any witnesses say they saw as well so in situations where no tickets are issued or cause of fault is listed the insurance companies will get together and determine the fault. Sometimes when two cars back into each other there may just be levels of fault whereby each party may be partly at fault which never benefits anybody.
if it's clear that the other person was at fault or was drunk then yes he couldAdded: In such an instance it would be better for appearance sake, as well as prosecuting the case later in court, if the investigation was done by another officer or agency.