answersLogoWhite

0

If an appellate court believes a decision was wrong, it may reverse or modify the lower court's ruling. Additionally, the appellate court could remand the case back to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with its findings. The court's decision may also include clarifications on legal interpretations to guide future cases.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What statement about appellate courts is true?

In the United States, all courts have appellate jurisdiction except the trial courts. The federal court system is divided into three layers. First is the US District Court (trial court) hears the original case; if one of the parties believes the decision is wrong, the case is then appealed to the US Court of Appeals Circuit Court (intermediate appellate court) with jurisdiction over the original trial court. If the party that loses at the Circuit level believes the decision is wrong, the case may be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States (highest appellate court). The chance of being heard by the Supreme Court is very small due to the number of cases submitted to them each year. Most state court systems follow a similar pattern, but the name of the trial and appellate courts vary by state. Some states have more than one level of trial court, divided by seriousness of crime.


What Supreme Court decision established the Supreme Court power of judicial review?

To decide whether the preceding court correctly decided the case in accordance with law. The appellate court decides whether the preceding court's decisions correctly decided the law in accordance with the facts, whether there were serious errors, or whether the court did something wrong. If there are no errors the appellate court upholds or confirms the prior decision. Otherwise it sends it back to the trial court with instructions and potential retrial. Sometimes it finds the decision totally wrong and discards it altogether, potentially because the case should not have been tried or because there was no case.


Can an appellate court come to its own conclusions of the law?

Appelate Courts do not try cases. They can rule if the law was applied improperly (i.e.: they could rule that certain"facts" were improperly admitted at trial) or that the administrative procedures were wrong or incorrect. Or, they can over-turn the verdict and return the case to lower court to be re-tried.


What does it mean if a losing side in a court case wants to appeal the case?

It means that they want another shot at the case or they think the lower court was wrong, so they appeal to a higher case which reviews the lower court's decision for an error in law and facts. If they win on appeal, the appellate court either rules in their favor or remands (returns) the case back to the lower court to redecide.


Explain how a criminal case can go from district court to an appeals court and then the supreme court?

Criminal cases heard at the Federal District Court level may be "appealed" to one of the Federal Appellate Courts based on an error that the District Court made. The Federal Appellate courts must hear cases appealed from the District Courts (in other words, you are guaranteed at least one appeal), however the Supreme Court is not required to hear cases appealed from the Appellate Court. After an unfavorable ruling at the Appellate Court level, the criminal defendant (or the United States/Prosecution) may seek a writ of certiori in order to appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will grant or deny the writ of certiori depending on several factors in the case (how notable is this case, is it a good "vehicle," is this an important issue, is it very contentious, is there a circuit split, is the decision patently wrong?). If the Court grants certiori, that means that they will hear it. If it denies the writ, the Appellate Court's judgment is final. Keep in mind that only a very small potion of cases make it to the Supreme Court level (less than one percent), so the cases that the Court decides to hear are always notable.


What does it mean when a case is vacated and remanded?

Previous answer was partially right. The "reverse and remand" or "vacate and remand" are from an appellate court decision based on a previous courts decision. Remand has nothing to do with "remanding" the person into custody, and the judgment of reverse or vacate can apply to either te sentencing / convinction or both, but it is not seperate. ( reverse doesn't just apply to crime and remand apply to sentencing ) When a sentence is vacated, it means the previous courts decision is void. When it is "reversed" it means the previous court was wrong, and the opposite decision should have been affirmed. However, Once a decision is made, the remedy or actions to correct the wrong judgement must also be re-addressed. ( I.E. you get wrongfully convicted of 1st degree murder, but still committed a crime resulting in death) Once the decision that your 1st degree murder charge was erroneous is made, your case (Not your person) is remanded (or sent back) to the previous court, to either retry the case based on the new info from the appellate court, or is remanded to a previous court to correct sentencing based upon the findings of the appellate court. judgement affirmed means that nothing needs to change and no errors were made in the previous courts procedure / decision.


Decision of a Jude or court?

Decisions, though made by individual judges are always decisions of the court. That is why whether the decision is manifestly wrong ab initio, the judge is not sued for it but an appeal to a higher court is advised.


What do appellate judges look for when they review a case?

Generally Appellate Judges are not looking for anything when they review a case. An appeal lawyer has presented his reasons why the appellate court should grant relief for his client. He lists the reasons on his brief. It refers to specific lines on transcript and to relevant case law. The judges read his brief. The opponent's attorney (prosecutor if criminal or plaintiff if civil) may enter his brief and explains why the other lawyer is wrong. The Appellate Judges examine the arguments and make their decision. (A lot of the work is done by law clerks just out of law school. They check the legal references in the law library or on line. Then they bring the relevant ones to the judges with their suggested decisions. The Judges read the clerks conclusions but make their own decisions.


Why does the US Supreme Court sometimes reverse its earlier decisions?

court decision reflect changing social political and economic condition


Why would an appeal be filled in a lawsuit?

An appeal is an application to a higher court for the review of the decision of a lower court. Depending upon the jurisdiction, courts have different names, but the "bottom" level is the trial court. It is there that a judge hears the facts (testimony, documents, expert witnesses, etc.), considers arguments of counsel as to how to interpret the facts and what law to apply. One would file an appeal to the next higher level of court if he/she believed that either the wrong law was applied to the facts that were elicited at trial, or that the law was applied improperly. An appellate court does not re-hear the facts or substitute its view of the facts for that of the trial court. It may, however, "remand" the case to the trial court to reconsider the evidence in light of the appellate court's determination of the issues of law.


A judicial decision handed down in court uses the what level of diction?

A judicial decision handed down in court uses a formal level of diction. Wrong answers include popular, informal, and colloquial.


What are the three types of courts that make up the judicial branch in Illinois?

Circuit Court, Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court.