If the line item veto were constitutional, it would enhance the executive branch's power by allowing the president to selectively reject specific provisions of legislation without vetoing the entire bill. This could lead to a more significant influence over the budget process and policy-making, potentially undermining Congress's power to control spending and legislate. Additionally, it could encourage more negotiation and compromise between the branches, but it risks upsetting the checks and balances designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. Overall, the line item veto could shift the balance of power towards the presidency.
they thought the balance of power would keep them from dieing
The way it would affect the ecological balance is whatever eats the red wolf would die and whatever ate that would die and it goes on and on and on
the sout's balance of power was the senate. Addition of non slaqve states would upset that balance of power
As of now, Obama has not been stripped of power. If such an action were to occur, it would have significant implications for the political landscape and the functioning of the government. It could lead to a constitutional crisis and raise questions about the balance of power between the branches of government.
No the simple answer is No
governments that are characterized by legal restraints on political power
The carp would eat plankton, mussels, and plants, which affect the natural balance
They would have consul it
governments that are characterized by legal restraints on political power
the proviso would upset the balance of power between the north and the south
yes
censure