0
In tort claim if plaintiff's attorney does call a witness to testify can defense call same witness to testify against plaintiff?
The plaintiff is not required to provide witnesses to a case, per se; although they must prove their case (It is very hard to do without at least one witness, normally the plaintiff alone). In either case however the defense is not limited in its ability to call any witness to the case, as long as the plaintiff is notified of the witness who will appear and the witness will provide material testimony about the case.
Additional: The defense cannot elicit brand-new testimony from the plaintiffs witness, however the witness is subject to cross-examination by the defense, who will try to either draw out testimony favorable to his client, or to impeach the testimony that the witness gave on direct examination.
What else can I help you with?
What two types of attorneys in a trial?
In a trial, the two main types of attorneys are defense attorneys who represent the accused and prosecutors who represent the government and present the case against the accused. Defense attorneys work to protect the rights of the defendant and provide a defense against the charges, while prosecutors work to prove the guilt of the accused.
Who brings case to court?
The "plaintiff" or sometimes the "complainant". In criminal cases, where the District Attorney is bringing the case, he/she is doing so on behalf of the people of the State, who are described as the "plaintiffs".
What factors does a defense use in civil case against the plaintiff?
Your question is too broad to be answered as written, as the nature of the defense depends upon the cause of action asserted by the Plaintiff.
Who does the defence attorney work for?
The defense attorney works for the defendant, or the person being accused. The accuser is known as a plaintiff, and they will often will also have a lawyer on their side when in court.
What are the six arguments a defense attorney can use as a defense against a criminal indictment?
cross contaminated evidence...
Who has the harder job a defense attorney or a prosecuting attorney?
Well,a prosecutor is someone who prosecutes,meaning files arguments against the suspect or the one breaking the law. While the Defense Attorney is the one falsify the arguments given by the prosecuting attorney technically the defense attorney's job is harder because most prosecuting attorney don't file charges that aren't good and it is hard to defend against something that counts on witnesses and evidences.
What is the difference between an affirmative defense and a counterclaim in a legal case?
An affirmative defense is a response to a legal claim where the defendant admits the facts alleged by the plaintiff but offers a justification or excuse for their actions. A counterclaim, on the other hand, is a separate claim made by the defendant against the plaintiff, alleging that the plaintiff has caused harm or injury to the defendant.
Is Consent a defense to the tort of battery?
Consent is a defense to the tort of battery if the plaintiff willingly and knowingly agreed to the harmful or offensive contact that resulted in the battery. If valid consent was given, it can serve as a defense against a claim of battery.
What is plaintiffs bar?
. the attorney who represents a plaintiff (the suing party) in a lawsuit. In lawyer parlance a "plaintiff's attorney" refers to a lawyer who regularly represents persons who are suing for damages, while a lawyer who is regularly chosen by an insurance company to represent its insureds is called a "defense attorney." The call to the bar (rarely, call to bar) is a legal term of art in most common law jurisdictions where persons must be qualified to be allowed to argue in court on behalf of another party and are then said to have been "called to the bar" or to have received a "call to the bar." "The bar" is now used as a collective ...
What is the duration of Attorney for the Defense?
The duration of Attorney for the Defense is 1.17 hours.
What defense provides justification of a tort?
The defense of consent can provide justification of a tort if the defendant can show that the plaintiff agreed to the conduct that caused the harm. This defense asserts that the plaintiff willingly accepted the risk associated with the defendant's actions.
What is the difference between an affirmative defense and a defense in legal proceedings?
An affirmative defense is when the defendant presents new evidence to counter the plaintiff's claims, while a defense in legal proceedings is a general denial or rebuttal of the plaintiff's claims without presenting new evidence.
