Usually, a contract is only valid when there is bargained for consideration. However, the promise might still be enforced without consideration in cases that fall under the promissory estoppel. This means that the promise reasonably relied on the promise and has suffered a detriment due to the reliance.
No
apple
An assumpsit is a promise or undertaking founded on a consideration, or an action to recover damages for breach of a promise.
It is called consideration.
Mean consideration refers to something of value exchanged by parties in a contract, such as money or services. Promise is a commitment made by one party to do something or refrain from doing something in the context of a contract or agreement. Both mean consideration and promise are essential elements of a legally binding contract.
Consideration is the Promise or Performance that flows between the parties to a contract. It is also called legal detriment.
It is consideration given that allows for the enforcement of a promise/contract.
It is unclear if Uncle Jack breaks his promise without more context. It would depend on the specific promise and circumstances surrounding it.
An enforceable contract requires the existence of the following elements: an offer, an acceptance that mirrors the terms of the offer, consideration, and lawful subject matter. The "consideration" can consist of money, property, a promise--just about anything of value that is not unlawful. Generally, a court will not inquire into the adequacy of the consideration. "Consideration" might be thought of as the "this for that" or the "quid pro quo". Even of the other elements are present, a contract cannot be enforced if the object of it is unlawful. That is, one cannot, for example, enforce a contract to rob a bank.
reciprocal promise is , if free concent and the consideration of both party are there .
true
there should be a consideration for each party........