0
The Fourth Amendment would be violated in circumstances where law enforcement conducts an unreasonable search or seizure without a warrant or probable cause. For example, if police enter a person's home without consent, a warrant, or exigent circumstances, it constitutes a violation. Similarly, if they stop and search an individual without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, that would also breach Fourth Amendment protections.
What else can I help you with?
How was the first amendment violated during the Salem witch trials?
the Salem Witch trails took place in 1692 and the first amendment was adopted December 15, 1791 so they could not be violating the first amendment. EDIT: If the amendment had existed, it would not have been violated. The victims were arrested on evidence the government declared viable, they were given a fair civil trial and convicted on a charge that was legal in Puritan Massachusetts.
Which amendment protects you from the government searching your house or property anytime it wishes?
That amendment would be the fourth amendment
Which amendment would be violated if a person was fined ten thousand dollar for a parking ticket?
The 8th Amendment, which prohibits excessive fines or bail.
A person who claims her First Amendment rights were violated would have her case tried in?
I dont KNOW the Answer?
What is done on a loss of down penalty on fourth down?
You would take the penalty, whatever the circumstance. It would then continue to be fourth down starting from the new line of scrimmage. (NFL)
What supreme court cases involve the fourth amendment?
Given the content and purpose of the Amendment, it would be something to do with an unreasonable search or seizure of property.Amendment IVThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.A search or seizure, The Fourth Amendment protects against a search or seizure
What would happen if the fourth amendment wasnt added?
if we the people of America didn't have the fourth amendment then the government or authorities can invade our privacy and go threw our belongings without any type of consent.
How was the Fourth Amendment violated in the Marbury v Madison case?
It may be difficult to make a case that anyone's Fourth Amendment rights were violated in Marbury v. Madison.Amendment IV"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."Maybe one could argue Marbury's commission was illegally seized or that withholding the paperwork prevented him from being secure in his "...papers, and effects..." but it would be difficult to apply this concept to something that was never in Marbury's possession. The Fourth Amendment applies when there is both a "search" and a "seizure," and pertains primarily to privacy rights. Marbury was never subject to an invasion of his person or belongings, with or without a warrant.Marshall held Marbury was entitled to receive his commission, but the deprivation was a civil matter, not criminal.Likewise, the Fourth Amendment has no application to the commissions relative to the government officials, Adams, Marshall, Jefferson, or Madison (actually Levi Lincoln), because the paperwork and premises belonged to the government, not to any of them, personally.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
Officers enter the house looking for a parolee and found a weapon did they violate the 4th amendment?
Whether officers violated the Fourth Amendment by entering the house depends on the circumstances of their entry. If they had a valid warrant, consent, or exigent circumstances, their search may be lawful. However, if they entered without proper justification, it could be considered an unlawful search and seizure. The presence of the weapon would then be subject to exclusion if the initial entry was unconstitutional.
What would to happen if you were to break the fourth amendment?
If the Fourth Amendment were to be broken, it would mean that law enforcement could conduct searches and seizures without probable cause or a warrant, leading to potential violations of individual privacy rights. This could result in illegal evidence collection, wrongful arrests, and a general erosion of trust in the justice system. Additionally, any evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment may be deemed inadmissible in court, impacting the prosecution's ability to secure convictions. Overall, breaking this amendment would undermine the legal protections designed to safeguard citizens from government overreach.
Which amendment covers search and seizure issues?
That would be Amendment Four. It reads: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Amendment Five, well known for refusal to testify against ones self, touches slightly upon this, reading: nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
What guaranteed rights would be violated by being turned away form a polling place because there arent enough workers to man the polling booth?
15th amendment rights
