No, a marriage is not valid if one of the parties is already married.
no, someone who is married to more than one person is a bigamist. In order for a marriage to be valid, both parties must be unmarried.
In order for a marriage to be recognized as valid, legal requirements typically include obtaining a marriage license, meeting age requirements, and having the ceremony performed by a licensed officiant. Additionally, both parties must consent to the marriage and not be already married to someone else.
Yes. Just like people whoimmigrate to the U.S. and are already married, their marriage is valid.
You are already married, you can't apply for a license. The US will recognize a valid marriage in another country.
no
Your marriage is not valid. If the person intentionally married you without divorcing their spouse they have committed bigamy.
No!
No. Once someone has a marriage annulled in civil court the parties are free from each other and any subsequent marriage is valid as long as the subsequent marriage took place afterthe first marriage was annulled.A marriage that was entered while one of the parties was still married (which would be the case prior to an annulment) is null and void. A subsequent annulment of that first marriage would not "cure" the second one. The parties must arrange to get married legally.
No, the marriage isn't valid. You can only be married to one person at a time in the US. She is a bigamist.
In Bali, couples must meet the legal requirements for marriage, which include providing valid identification, obtaining a marriage license, and having a ceremony conducted by a recognized officiant. Additionally, both parties must be of legal age and not already married to someone else.
Of course not. In order to get married in California, they would have to lie on their marriage license application which will invalidate the license and make the marriage illegal.
No. A civil annulment provides that there was no valid marriage in the first place and the parties are free as if they were never married. Therefore, they have no legal claim to the other's estate.An ecclesiastical annulment in itself does not dissolve a marriage. It must be followed by a civil divorce.No. A civil annulment provides that there was no valid marriage in the first place and the parties are free as if they were never married. Therefore, they have no legal claim to the other's estate.An ecclesiastical annulment in itself does not dissolve a marriage. It must be followed by a civil divorce.No. A civil annulment provides that there was no valid marriage in the first place and the parties are free as if they were never married. Therefore, they have no legal claim to the other's estate.An ecclesiastical annulment in itself does not dissolve a marriage. It must be followed by a civil divorce.No. A civil annulment provides that there was no valid marriage in the first place and the parties are free as if they were never married. Therefore, they have no legal claim to the other's estate.An ecclesiastical annulment in itself does not dissolve a marriage. It must be followed by a civil divorce.