0
Yes, it is generally permissible to introduce new evidence during a trial, but there are rules and procedures that govern the admissibility of such evidence. The judge has the discretion to allow or exclude new evidence based on factors such as relevance, reliability, and fairness to both parties.
What else can I help you with?
Is it permissible for new evidence to be introduced during a trial?
Yes, it is generally permissible for new evidence to be introduced during a trial, as long as it is relevant to the case and meets the rules of evidence.
How can the defense attorney effectively introduce new evidence during the trial to support their case?
The defense attorney can effectively introduce new evidence during the trial by following the rules of evidence, seeking permission from the judge, and presenting the evidence in a clear and convincing manner to support their case.
What happens if someone requests evidence in court but the prosecutors fail to present it?
You cannot "request evidence." If the prosecution does not introduce it at trial then there is nothing for the defense to request. If the defense has its own evidence they may introduce that. During the 'discovery' phase of the trial both sides will have, should have, listed all the evidence they intended to introduce. However, the failure of one side or the other to actually introduce it does not open the door for the opposition to demand that it be introduced.
When did Charlemagne introduce trial by jury?
Charlemagne did not introduce trial by jury; it was a legal institution that developed in England during the 12th century. The concept of trial by jury involves a group of impartial individuals from the community who listen to evidence and determine the guilt or innocence of a defendant in a legal case.
Should evidence be admitted in a prosecution's opening statements?
Evidence is never admitted during the opening statement, and the judges usually admonish the jury specifically that opening statements are only argument and not evidence. However, prosecutors will often show to the jury some evidence that they intend to introduce during the trial, but if for some reason that evidence is not introduced during the trial, the defendant can move for a mistrial at the close of the prosecution's case.
Is it permissible for jurors to communicate with lawyers after a trial has concluded?
No, it is not permissible for jurors to communicate with lawyers after a trial has concluded.
Can a judge refuse to look at evidence presented during a trial?
No, a judge cannot refuse to look at evidence presented during a trial. It is their responsibility to consider all relevant evidence in making a fair and just decision.
Can you win a gun trial?
Can is a misleading word. You can win any trial if you convince the jury you aren't guilty. Whether you can do that depends on what evidence you can provide, or if your attorney can introduce reasonable doubt.
Can new evidence be presented after a mistrial?
Yes, new evidence can be presented after a mistrial, especially if a retrial is ordered. In a retrial, both parties have the opportunity to introduce new evidence that may not have been available during the initial trial. However, the admissibility of this evidence will still be subject to the rules of evidence and the discretion of the judge. Additionally, the nature of the mistrial may influence what evidence can be introduced.
What is an Amended Discovery Exhibit?
It refers to a piece of evidence that either the prosecution or the defense wishes to introduce into trial that has come to light after the discovery" process had already been concluded. "Exhibit" is just a legal word for a piece of evidence, and, "amended" means that the evidence list for the trial will have this addition made to it.
What does request for discovery mean?
In law, discovery refers to the right of each party to see the evidence that the other party(s) intend to introduce at trial.
Which term refers to an official examination of available evidence in a court of law?
The term you are looking for is "trial." During a trial, evidence is presented and examined to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused.
