If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
No,but 120 is and 301 isn't
301 * * * * * Actually, all three are.
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
If you define a rectangular number as a number which is the product of two consecutive integers, none of them qualify.
301 is not prime. 301 = 7 * 43
A rectangular number is any number greater than or equal to 2, that is the product of an positive integer n multiplied by the integer that comes before it. So 2x1 for example or 5x4 or 10x111. If you look at the number 93120301=n(n+1), this number is rectangular if n^2+n-93120301=0 has a solution that is a positive integer. There is no integer solution so that number is not rectangular. How about 93? n^2+n-93=0 also has no solution in the natural numbers.
Composite.
72 is rectangular.
A rectangular number is a number which is the product of two consecutive integers.
No, 301 is not a prime number. A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 that cannot be formed by multiplying two smaller natural numbers. In the case of 301, it can be expressed as 7 x 43, indicating that it has factors other than 1 and itself, making it a composite number.