No, it is a community property state. In a CP state all property acquired during the marriage is considered to be equally owned by both spouses, and in most cases all debts incurred during the marriage are considered to be the equal responsibility of both spouses.
yes
yes
No, Maine is not a tenancy by entirety state. In Maine, property can be held in several forms of co-ownership, but tenancy by the entirety, which is typically available only to married couples, is not recognized. Instead, Maine allows for joint tenancy and tenancy in common as the primary forms of co-ownership.
Yes, NC is a tenancy by the entireties state.
Yes. Tenancy by the entirety is available for married people in Missouri.
Yes. Tenancy by the entirety is recognized in Utah. See related link.
No it is community property
Yes. Indiana Code 32-17-3, et.seq., contemplates tenancy by the entirety for married couples, and the tenancy is supported in case law.
Montana is not a tenancy by the entirety state. In Montana, property can be held in several forms, including joint tenancy and tenancy in common, but tenancy by the entirety, which is typically reserved for married couples, is not recognized. Couples in Montana may choose to hold property as joint tenants with rights of survivorship instead.
Montana does not recognize tenancy by the entirety.
Yes. The tenancy by the entirety was created in Illinois in 1990. See this article for more information: http://cmetro.ctic.com/TitleIssues/v1n7.pdf The tenancy by the entirety statute is found at Section 1c under the Illinois Joint Tenancy Act found at 765 ILCS 1005/1.
California is not an entirety state; it is a state within the United States. The term "entirety state" typically refers to jurisdictions that recognize the concept of tenancy by the entirety, which is a form of joint property ownership available only to married couples. California does not recognize tenancy by the entirety; instead, it has community property laws that govern how property is owned and divided between spouses.