Contaminated evidence can be admissible in court, but its reliability and credibility may be challenged during trial. The prosecution or defense may need to demonstrate that despite the contamination, the evidence is still relevant and can contribute to the case. The judge will assess factors such as the extent of contamination and how it was handled. Ultimately, the decision rests on the jurisdiction's rules of evidence and the circumstances surrounding the contamination.
Most blood samples collected at crime scenes IS dried. It is easily reconstituted without degrading the cellular evidence it contains.
AA meetings can be admissible in court. If they are court ordered or relevant to an issue or evidence, then it usually is admissible.
Hearsay
Your mode of dress is not admissible in court. The evidence cries to be admissible, your honor!
Yes, text messages are generally admissible as evidence in court, as long as they meet the requirements for authenticity and relevance.
Yes, video recordings can be admissible as evidence in court, as long as they meet certain criteria such as relevance, authenticity, and reliability.
Yes, cell phone video can be admissible as evidence in court if it meets the necessary legal requirements and is authenticated properly.
Yes, video evidence is generally admissible in court as long as it meets certain criteria, such as being relevant, authentic, and not unfairly prejudicial.
The evidence was not admissible in court due to it having no relevance to the proceedings.
Yes, a recorded phone call can be admissible in court as evidence, but it must meet certain legal requirements to be considered admissible, such as being relevant to the case and obtained legally.
No, abandoned or thrown out evidence is generally considered inadmissible in court due to issues of chain of custody and the potential for tampering. To be admissible, evidence must be properly collected, preserved, and handled in accordance with legal procedures.