Yes
A state may have concurrent jurisdiction with a federal court when, for example, a crime defined under state law is committed on federal property, and certain offenses involving Indian tribal members.
It is defined by state or federal law. In Oregon, for example, a police officer has authority through the entire state.
That will depend on the jurisdiction, federal or state, and if it is a state, which state.
Cases that have federal jurisdiction. They can either arise under federal law or be state law cases that gain jurisdiction through diversity jurisdiction.
Concurrent jurisdiction
executive jurisdiction
Concurrent jurisdiction
Legal cases fall under federal jurisdiction if they involve federal laws, the U.S. Constitution, or parties from different states. State jurisdiction applies to cases involving state laws or parties within the same state. The criteria for determining jurisdiction include the nature of the legal issues and the parties involved.
Alcohol for consumption is taxed and regulated at both the Federal and the State levels, so it is both a federal and a state offense. However, since the federal jurisdiction trumps the state jurisdiction only the federal government can charge you.
Concurrent jurisdiction allows both state and federal courts to hear cases involving federal laws, diversity of citizenship cases, and cases involving concurrent jurisdiction statutes. It means either court can hear the case.
The key differences between federal and state court systems lie in their jurisdiction and authority. Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving federal laws, the Constitution, and disputes between states. State courts have jurisdiction over cases involving state laws, local ordinances, and most civil and criminal matters within their state. Federal courts have authority to interpret federal laws and the Constitution, while state courts have authority to interpret state laws and their own state constitution.
They do not have jurisdiction.