False
Apparent authority is a legal concept pursuant to which an agent can be found to have bound a principal (master) despite not having the actual authority to do so. If the principal gives to the agent certain indicia of authority (for example, business cards, a title, etc) that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the agent has the authority to bind the principal, and the principal did nothing to countermand it, the principal may be bound by the acts of the agent. This theory, put into the context of an insurer/insurance agent, is what is meant by the term.
Both the federal and state governments are bound to enforce the laws.
The Government is not bound by the 'result' of these forms of referendum. Federal, State and Territory governments have held these types of referendums.
the federal government and states are legally dual sovereigns; the supreme court of the United States is in many cases the appellate court from the state supreme court. The supreme courts of each state are the final authority on the interpretation of the applicable state laws and constitution. The state supreme court is bound only by the U.S. supreme courts interpreted by the federal law.
The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, establishes that federal law takes precedence over state laws and state constitutions when there is a conflict. This means that judges in every state are bound to uphold federal laws, even if state laws oppose them. It ensures a uniform national legal framework, reinforcing the authority of the federal government in matters specified by the Constitution.
The 10th amendment does not apply to this question (per se). States are not required to accept any block grants (under any program) from the US Government; if they do however they are bound by terms under Federal Law that goes past just those grant funds. To date every state in the USA accepts these grant funds, and they are therefore bound by Federal laws at a state level.
the principle that i think expresses the idea that government is bound by the rule of law is the limited government because it asks you what principle expresses the idea that government is bound by the rule of law meaning which priciple shows that the government has limited powers and limited government would be that priciple.
limited government
The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution and establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties take precedence over state laws. It asserts that judges in every state are bound by the Constitution, regardless of state laws that conflict with it. Essentially, it ensures a uniform legal framework across the nation, reinforcing the federal government's authority in matters of national concern. This clause is foundational in resolving conflicts between state and federal legislation.
the agent acted within the scope of their authority. If the agent has actual or apparent authority to negotiate and bind the principal, the principal will be liable for the contract. Conversely, if the agent exceeded their authority or acted outside the agreed-upon terms, the principal may not be bound by the contract. Additionally, the nature of the agent's actions and the principal's knowledge of those actions can also affect liability.
the principle that i think expresses the idea that government is bound by the rule of law is the limited government because it asks you what principle expresses the idea that government is bound by the rule of law meaning which priciple shows that the government has limited powers and limited government would be that priciple.
the principle that i think expresses the idea that government is bound by the rule of law is the limited government because it asks you what principle expresses the idea that government is bound by the rule of law meaning which priciple shows that the government has limited powers and limited government would be that priciple.