if the bartender is found to have "over served" the customer then maybe. but i doubt that the police ever go that far. maybe the DUI offender can sue. but that's about it.
Both the bartender AND the teenagers coulkd be criminally charged, however it is business's ABC license which would be placed jeapordy.
In reference to law, the word "liable "is the act of being held responsible. for example, when there is a puddle on the flood in a grocery store and there is not a wet floor warning sign, if a customer slips and falls, the company will be held liable for the customers injury expenses.
That bartender (and most likely the owner of the establishment as well) will be fined or held liable for civil charges and can be fined and possibly (depending on the state) receive jail time and/or community service. Check with your local or state Alcohol Beverage Control agency.
Internet service provider or "ISPs" provide Internet access service to customers such as storing data for their customers' use on a Usenet newsgroup server or a world wide web server.The ISP can be held liable if the activities of its customers are generally based on a knowledge of the customer's activity unaware of the behavior of its customer or ISP becomes aware of the customer's activity, or should have become aware of the activity with reasonable diligence, courts are much more likely to hold the ISP liable for its customer's actions.
Yes you can, BUT that also means that you are accepting responsibility for any law that the bartender breaks according to your state's alcohol laws and you will be held liable. For example, if the bartender serves to a minor and gets slapped with a $1000 fine, then you are now responsible for that fine and the employee is not required to pay it. The state recognizes you as the responsible party.
No, you don't have to. But you do have to sign that you are fully aware and liable for getting that piercing and stuff like that
If the incident happens because of the carelessness of the customer in protecting his logon id and password the bank is not responsible. If the incident happens due to some mistake in the bank system then it is liable.
YES. Oregon is an equitable distribution state. Typically a spouse can be held liable for the medical bills of the other spouse under the doctrine of necessaries. This doctrine hold that a spouse is liable for the necessaries of the other spouse. Necessaries are items that are essential such as food, shelter and medical bills.
Oregon would not be the "liable state" (responsible to pay unemployment) and whether she was eligible when she quit is up to the individual state. Some allow it, to follow the spouse, and others do not.
If you buy it in Texas then you will be liable for sales tax. Otherwise no other taxes should be levied against you.
The banks have the rights to return bad checks and take the money deposited in your account beforehand. You need to deal with the people who give the bad check yourself.
Getting a devorce and house is facing forclosure but my name is not on deed. Am I liable.