There can be no definite answer to this question. Suffice it to say, that the greater or more serious the offense, therefore the harsher the possible penalty, the better odds would tend to favor a jury trial.
Many attorneys advise their clients that, if they are actually innocent, they should choose trial by judge, because a judge is presumed to actually understand and take serious the principle of "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Likewise, judges are less likely to be confused or dazzled by effective advocacy, meaning they are less likely to acquit a guilty person. Jurors, however, are more likely to acquit a guilty defendant (than is a judge), and thus are a better choice for a defendant who is actually (or likely) guilty.
Overall, however, juries are more likely to convict a defendant, regardless of actual guilt.
It depends on the case. If it is a case where the defendant is likable and there aren't many technical legal issues at hand, or the judge is fairly harsh, a jury trial would be better. If it is a case where legal technicalities are a big issue, or the judge is fairly defense friendly, or the defendant is particularly scary to the general public, you probably want a bench trial. You should discuss the pros and cons with your attorney. He/she will have a better grasp on the law at issue, the jury pool in the area, and the reputation of the judge.
The option to a jury trial is called a "bench trial." This is where a judge hears the evidence and decides without a jury. In criminal cases, the defense almost always prefers a jury trial because you only have to convince one of the jury members to avoid a conviction. Judges may be seen as less susceptible to using sympathy for a "victim" to convict than a jury. Also, if the case is more about some complex legal issue than the facts, a judge is more likely to understand the defense and find a defendant not guilty. In civil cases, a non- jury trial is better for the party that believes the law is on their side, and the jury trial is better suited for the party that hopes to confuse the jury and win based on other factors. A final consideration is cost. Non-jury trials are much shorter and therefore less expensive.
In the United States, statistics show that jury trials are more common than bench trials. According to data, about 90-95 of criminal cases and 80-90 of civil cases are decided by juries. Bench trials, where a judge decides the case without a jury, are less common. This is due to the preference for a jury of peers to decide the outcome of a trial in many legal systems.
(in the US) you are entitled to have a jury of regular citizens hear your case rather than simply be judged by a judicial official. It is not necessary in ALL cases, to have a jury hear your case, you MAY request a bench trial if you wish. However in some capital cases you may not be granted a bench trial even if you request it, because of the consequences to you of a guilty verdict.
Yes, in civil cases where the amount in dispute is more than 20, you have the right to request a jury trial.
if jury number 8 wasnt on trial than, the boy that is on trial would probley be killed right now
The principle of limited government is exemplified by the right to a trial by jury. The right of a trial by jury is the right to have your fate decided by fellow citizens rather than by a government employee.
At law, in a jury trial, the jury makes findings of factand the judge makes conclusions of law. In a bench trial, the judge makes both findings of fact and conclusions of law.To distinguish this type of jury from the grand jury, it is sometimes known as a petit jury. Also, less formally than the law French, it is known as a jury of one's peers.
pizza
It means In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. THIS IS A HELPFUL ANSWER!!
Right to a trial by jury In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
After the indictment of the defendant. Not enough info given to be more specific than that.