It can be. It is up to the prosecutor or the defense lawyer. They need to be notarized.
yes
Generally, written testimony is unavailing if the other side does not have a chance to cross-examine the witness. It doesn't hurt to try, though, if that's the best you can do. A notarized statement might be very helpful to establish damages if the other side defaults (does not show up) and you can be awarded whatever damages you can prove.
When the Police charge a suspect, they require evidence. Without evidence, there is no hope for a conviction at trial. A witness statement is one form of evidence. Clearly having more evidence like video or DNA etc...would strengthen any case. The credibility of the witness, detail o the statement, and number of witnesses all play a factor, but the simple answer is yes, charges can be laid. That doesn't necessarily mean a conviction will be rendered
Yes, an affidavit can be used as evidence in a court of law. An affidavit is a written statement made under oath, and it is considered a form of evidence that can be presented in court to support a party's case.
According to the police, an independent witness is someone who is not led by that of a friend or someone who can be influenced by you. For example, if you were verbally assaulted by another and you had 10 friends at your side who witnessed this, their statement cannot be used in a court of law or as evidence. So unjust I know, believe me.... But if you want an independent witness, try someone you don't know.
An accepted statement of fact is a written or oral declaration in a court case that is approved. This is commonly used as evidence.
The court order requiring the release of a witness is typically called a "subpoena." A subpoena commands the witness to appear and testify or produce evidence in a legal proceeding. If the witness is in custody, a "writ of habeas corpus" may also be used to secure their release for testimony.
False statements are often used in court, primarily to impeach testimony of a witness by shedding doubt upon his or her verisimilitude. ("if he were willing to lie then, he may be willing to lie now...")
Yes. As long as evidence of the the assets can be provided to the court. In fact, they need to be declared on the parent's financial statement to the court which is used to arrive at a figure under the state child support guidelines.Yes. As long as evidence of the the assets can be provided to the court. In fact, they need to be declared on the parent's financial statement to the court which is used to arrive at a figure under the state child support guidelines.Yes. As long as evidence of the the assets can be provided to the court. In fact, they need to be declared on the parent's financial statement to the court which is used to arrive at a figure under the state child support guidelines.Yes. As long as evidence of the the assets can be provided to the court. In fact, they need to be declared on the parent's financial statement to the court which is used to arrive at a figure under the state child support guidelines.
No, since the question presumes the evidence is hearsay; therefore it is inadmissible even if the witness had the highest degree of credibility. There are many exceptions to the hearsay rule and many instances where an out of court statement seems to be inadmissible hearsay but is not (i.e. non hearsay hearsay), that it serves no purpose to provide facts that would allow the statement to be used at trial. If the question posed more facts than just the statement that the evidence is hearsay, they would show whether the statement is admissible under an exception or as non hearsay hearsay. Once the statement is admitted as evidence it would be up to the jury to determine if the witness is believable.
An affidavit man is a man who in the 1700s and 1800s loitered around the courts in order to bear false witness.
Yes, emails can be used as evidence in court proceedings.