No. "Primary Authority" would refer to the underlying law promulgated by the Legislative Branch which the Supreme Court would refer to and interpret.
Technically no, because all states have autonomous jurisdiction. A US District Court decision is persuasive authority over a state court. A US District Court is a federal court, not a state court. A state supreme court decision however, is binding authority on a state appeals court level, and a trial court decision in that state would still be persuasive because its from a lower court. The decision from the Virginia Court of Appeals, however, becomes a binding authority over the state court.
Yes, the US Supreme Court has the authority to overrule a state supreme court's decision if it involves a federal law or constitutional issue.
Simple really, Primary authority is the verbatim text of laws, case laws, etc. and mandatory authority is the laws or case laws that a particular court must follow. All mandatory authority must be primary authority, but the reverse is not always true. For example. a murder case in district court in New York state MUST follow any and all rulings or laws of New York state and any higher courts. However, a murder case in Minnesota is not required to follow New York's laws and case laws even though they are primary authority. Also a higher court is never required to follow a lower courts decision even if it is a primary authority.To break it down to brass tacks, primary authority is really just the legal term for a primary source, same as regular research. A mandatory authority is about jurisdiction and stare deices.
The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Oregon Supreme Court's decision based on the interpretation of state law and constitutional principles. The court found that the Oregon law in question was consistent with established legal precedents and did not violate federal laws. Additionally, the justices considered the implications of the ruling on state sovereignty and the importance of upholding state legislative choices. This combination of legal reasoning and respect for state authority ultimately influenced their decision.
No. The State Court of Appeals is a superior court to that of a village court.
The authority to overrule state courts.
U.S Supreme Court
Which court are constitutional matters between the central authority and the state government arbitrated in nigeria
Yes. Once an executor has been appointed by the court they have the authority to settle the estate according to the provisions in the will and according to the state probate laws. Every executor has some degree of discretion in settling the estate and they have the final word. If the beneficiary has a bona fide complaint about an executor's decision they can file a motion for the court to render a decision on the matter.Yes. Once an executor has been appointed by the court they have the authority to settle the estate according to the provisions in the will and according to the state probate laws. Every executor has some degree of discretion in settling the estate and they have the final word. If the beneficiary has a bona fide complaint about an executor's decision they can file a motion for the court to render a decision on the matter.Yes. Once an executor has been appointed by the court they have the authority to settle the estate according to the provisions in the will and according to the state probate laws. Every executor has some degree of discretion in settling the estate and they have the final word. If the beneficiary has a bona fide complaint about an executor's decision they can file a motion for the court to render a decision on the matter.Yes. Once an executor has been appointed by the court they have the authority to settle the estate according to the provisions in the will and according to the state probate laws. Every executor has some degree of discretion in settling the estate and they have the final word. If the beneficiary has a bona fide complaint about an executor's decision they can file a motion for the court to render a decision on the matter.
President Andrew Jackson is often cited as a president who disobeyed a Supreme Court decision. In 1832, the Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia that the state could not impose its laws on Native American lands. Jackson reportedly responded by refusing to enforce the ruling, famously stating, "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it," highlighting the tensions between federal authority and state actions during his presidency.
Just because the state doesn't agree, if the US Supreme Court renders a decision in your favor the state must comply! There is no higher court than the US Supreme Court - the state cannot file an appeal.
99 9/10% of the time it is going to be the State court that has original jurisdiction.