No, hearsay is not admissible in any court case unless it falls under one of 18 exceptions. These exceptions are thought to remove the problems of hearsay testimony.
Not on hearsay alone. But they very well might use the hearsay to start a surveillance of you so that they can get direct evidence themselves. THEN, they could get a warrant for you.
Hearsay (information obtained second-hand, such as something overheard) is, absent certain conditions, inadmissible as evidence at trial. However, there are numerous exceptions to the hearsay rule. It's impossible to answer your question without knowing the facts of the case and the hearsay rules in the jurisdiction where the case is being heard.
That was just hearsay.
You can return your life proof case if you have not damaged it.
Life Proof Case for iPhone 5 Just 12.75$ http://www.aulola.com/life-proof-case-for-iphone-5-white.html
Hearsay Social was created in 2009.
Hearsay testimony is not admissable.
The judge would not accept her testimony as it was hearsay.
There is no proof that there is a president in GTA IV.
Bruce M. Botelho has written: 'Memorandum on hearsay' -- subject(s): Evidence, Hearsay, Hearsay Evidence
Evidence is crucial in a criminal case because it provides proof to support or refute allegations. It helps establish the facts of a case, allows for a fair trial where the truth can be determined, and influences the jury or judge in making a decision on guilt or innocence. Insufficient or unreliable evidence can result in wrongful convictions or acquittals.
A good one-word definition of hearsay: Gossip