It better be regulated by a state
Active euthanasia should not be legalized anywhere, however physician assisted suicide should be
The question of whether individuals who participate in euthanasia should be punished is complex and often hinges on legal, ethical, and cultural perspectives. In jurisdictions where euthanasia is legal, participants typically face no punishment, as the act is regulated under specific conditions. However, in places where it remains illegal, those involved may be subject to legal consequences. Ultimately, the discussion involves balancing compassion for suffering individuals with the ethical implications of taking life.
Wear the appropriate and regulated protective gear that SHOULD by law be provided in each workplace where heavy and dangerous machinery is used.
Monopolistic competitions should be regulated to protect consumers against exploitation.
In the United States, unsuccessful suicides or attempted suicides form the penal codes usually used to bar euthanasia. These are typically enforced at the state level. You should write to your regional congressperson in your state legislatures to try to persuade him to legalize euthanasia in your state.
Euthanasia is only done if the patient wants to after they have been evaluated to be of sane mind. So yes, if that fits.
There are various arguments for internet URLs being regulated. Some argue that pornographic sites should have to have their own URL.
It's not Insurance! ask who their underwriter is. The benefits provided are provided by National Motor Club yet they have a hospital Indemnity plan as a benefit. How they get away with that I don't know. They take premiums in and pay benefits out but are not regulated. They say they are providing services but they pay out benefits with checks and should be regulated by the Department of Insurance. Buyer Beware!
The question of whether animal euthanasia should be illegal is complex and often depends on context. Euthanasia can be a compassionate option for animals suffering from severe pain or terminal illness, allowing them to die peacefully rather than endure prolonged suffering. However, concerns arise regarding the potential for abuse and the ethical implications of deciding when an animal's life should end. Ultimately, any laws surrounding euthanasia should prioritize animal welfare while ensuring strict regulations and guidelines to prevent misuse.
NO.
Because GOD created life and will take life upon HIS timing.Answer:The option of euthanasia should be open to all who qualify for it. The withholding of euthanasia flies in the face of common humanity to a fellow sentient being. The process should involve the patient and/or his representative, and his doctor.
Diane Foster has written: 'Should voluntary euthanasia be legalised?'