99% of the time, no. However, one has to temper that with the idea that some acts deemed "illegal" in response to a law which itself would be morally unjust might be the exception. For example, during the period when slavery was an acceptable social behavior in the US, hiding a runaway slave, or aiding his or her escape, would have been considered a serious crime at the time. Added:This question should have more properly been posted under the "Ethics" category, and Prof Corey addresses THAT view in his answer. However - since it was posted under "Crime and Criminal Law' I will address it from that perspective: Hiding evidence of a crime puts you at risk of being criminally charged as an "Accessory" to that crime, and perhaps even as "Aiding and Abetting" the commission of the offense. Ethically, morally, and legally, you play a dangerous game when concealing evidence of known criminal activity.
Aiding and Abetting - Criminal Conspiracy - Obstruction of Justice - probably several other applicable laws depending on the criminal statutes of your state.
Although he did not commit the crime, he received jail time because he acted as an accomplice by helping to hide the evidence.
A murder
No, a defense attorney cannot legally hide evidence in a legal case. They are required to disclose all relevant evidence to ensure a fair trial.
No, FBI agents can not tamper with evidence or hide the evidence. This is an illegal act and could put the FBI agent in jail for a very long time and they would lose their job.
They had to hide evidence that they kept jews.
Man Against Crime - 1949 No Place to Hide 5-37 was released on: USA: 20 June 1954
Crime Story - 1986 Hide and Go Thief 1-12 was released on: USA: 12 December 1986
Exculpatory evidence frees your suspect from guilt. Hide it if you can
1) To hide evidence of an attacker's presence 2) To hide a back door into the system
There is no evidence to suggest that I have any association with the Nazi regime or anything to hide in that regard.
The punishment for hiding a murder weapon would depend on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances surrounding the crime. In general, it could lead to charges of obstruction of justice or tampering with evidence, which can result in fines, imprisonment, or both. Prosecutors would need to prove intent to hinder the investigation and connection to the crime in order to secure a conviction.