0
Yes. The evidence is presented in a courtroom. The jury hears it. The prosecutor presents his conclusion to the jury. The defense attorney presents his conclusion to the jury. The judge gives instructions to the jury. The jury goes to the jury room. The jury returns with the verdict. The term verdict is a fancy term for conclusion.
Both sides heard the same evidence. The prosecutor presented evidence. The defense attorney presented evidence.
In some cases there is a hung jury. That means one or more jurors heard the evidence and disagreed with the others and would not change his or her mind.
What else can I help you with?
What does indirect evidence mean in science?
Indirect evidence in science refers to information or data that suggests a conclusion without directly observing the phenomenon in question. It often relies on inference, supporting theories or hypotheses through related observations or experiments. For example, the existence of dark matter is inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter, rather than being directly observed. This type of evidence is crucial for building scientific understanding when direct measurements are not possible.
What makes an inference different from proof?
A proof assumes that there is only one correct answer/conclusion to a series of logical statements. An inference is also a conclusion, but it is possible that the connection from fact to conclusion could be interpreted differently by different people.
Why is it not possible or possible to roll your tongue?
Different people inherit different muscles. Some folks can, some can't. There is some evidence that it may even be genetic.
How can such apparently reliable evidence lead an auditor to an improper conclusion?
The auditor apparently is misinterpreting the reliable evidence presented to them. It would be advisable to have an experienced, licensed (CPA/EA) tax representative working for you to aid in this matter. Taxpayers such as yourself often mislead auditors with how they present information to them.
What is the best conclusion to make from this observation?
To provide an accurate conclusion, I would need specific details about the observation in question. However, generally speaking, the best conclusion should synthesize the key findings, highlight the implications of those findings, and suggest possible actions or further research based on the results. It's important to ensure that the conclusion is grounded in the evidence presented by the observation.
A possible explanation or answer to a question?
conclusion
What is an inductively strong argument and why is it considered to be valid when it has true premises?
An inductively strong argument is one where the premises provide good support for the conclusion, even though it is possible for the conclusion to be false. When an inductively strong argument has true premises, it is considered valid because the reasoning is sound and the conclusion is likely to be true based on the evidence provided.
How do you write a conclusion for a hypothesis?
To write a conclusion for a hypothesis, first summarize the key findings from your research or experiment that relate to the hypothesis. Assess whether the data supports or refutes the hypothesis, providing evidence to back your claim. Additionally, discuss the implications of your results and suggest possible directions for future research. Finally, keep the conclusion concise and focused on the main outcomes of your study.
How many paragraphs does a position paper need?
A position paper typically consists of three to five paragraphs. The paragraphs usually include an introduction, background information, argument with evidence, possible counterarguments, and a conclusion.
Is it possible to have only a predicate in a sentence?
A sentence must have a subject and predicate to be a sentence. The exception is when the subject is inferred. "going to the sale" is not a sentence. It needs a subject. We are going to the sale. is a sentence. Speaking to another person, "Stay here" is a sentence. The subject "you" is inferred.
What involves one or more reasons presented by a speaker or a writeer to lead the audience or reader to a logical conclusion?
Reaching logical conclusions depends on the proper analysis of premises. The goal of a syllogism is to arrange premises so that only one true conclusion is possible. Reaching logical conclusions depends on the proper analysis of premises. The goal of a syllogism is to arrange premises so that only one true conclusion is possible.
Do conclusions that are not logically supported invalidate the entire study?
Conclusions that are not logically supported do not necessarily invalidate the entire study, but they do call into question the credibility and reliability of the findings. Researchers should ensure that their conclusions are based on sound logical reasoning and evidence to maintain the validity of their study.
