0
Is it true that The controversy surrounding Gibbons vs Ogden was in whether the states or federal government had the right to regulate navigation?
Yes, that's correct. The controversy in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) centered on whether the federal government or the states had the authority to regulate interstate navigation and commerce. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the federal government had the power to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, thereby asserting federal supremacy over state laws in this area. This landmark decision helped define the scope of federal regulatory power in the United States.
What else can I help you with?
Whats the law that colonies trade had to be on English ships?
The law that required colonies to trade only on English ships is known as the Navigation Acts. These laws were implemented by the British government in the 17th century to regulate colonial trade and ensure that it benefited England's economy. The Navigation Acts aimed to restrict competition from other countries and increase profits for English merchants.
Sentence using word regulate?
The thermostat is broken and unable to regulate the temperature.The valve is used to regulate water flow.The government introduced a new law to regulate smoking in public places.
Why Government officials tried but failed to regulate the railroads?
The government was shutdown
What extent does china's government control and regulate the economy?
The Chinese Government has the power to totaly regulate the economy of China However no government has ever been able to controll an economy.
What was not something a state government can regulate?
immigration!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which of these tools does the government use to regulate?
policy
What organizations regulate cloning?
That is regulated by the government.
What government branch regulate commerce?
Legislative
What was the name of the British laws made to regulate trade between the colonies and other countries?
The Navigation Acts..i think.(:
Why was it necessary for marshall to take the trouble to explain why navigation should considered as part of commerce?
It was necessary for Marshall to explain why navigation should be considered as part of commerce in order to establish the broad scope of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause. By including navigation as part of commerce, Marshall expanded the definition of commerce to encompass all aspects of commercial activity, including transportation. This interpretation allowed Congress to regulate navigation as a means to facilitate and regulate interstate commerce effectively.
What can't the government regulate?
The Internet. They can but not very much.
How does the government effect the food industry?
They regulate it extensively.
