The lender is the beneficiary. The borrower is the trustor and the third party working for the lender is the trustee.
If the trustee was instructed to sell the property by the trustor- yes.If the trustee was instructed to sell the property by the trustor- yes.If the trustee was instructed to sell the property by the trustor- yes.If the trustee was instructed to sell the property by the trustor- yes.
It is evidence of a mortgage loan secured by a promissory note. It includes three parties: a trustor, a trustee and a beneficiary for it to be valide.
No, the trustor does not hold title in a deed of trust. In a deed of trust, the trustor is the borrower who transfers legal title of the property to a trustee, who holds it on behalf of the lender (beneficiary) until the loan is paid off. The trustor retains equitable title and the right to use and occupy the property.
The trustor is the person who executes the trust and transfers their property to the trustee. Since a trust cannot act for itself, the trustee is the entity named by the trustor to manage the property held by the trust. The trustee holds title to the trust property.
You must ask the trustor, the person who made the trust. Otherwise, you need to wait and see if you are ever notified that you are a beneficiary of a trust.You must ask the trustor, the person who made the trust. Otherwise, you need to wait and see if you are ever notified that you are a beneficiary of a trust.You must ask the trustor, the person who made the trust. Otherwise, you need to wait and see if you are ever notified that you are a beneficiary of a trust.You must ask the trustor, the person who made the trust. Otherwise, you need to wait and see if you are ever notified that you are a beneficiary of a trust.
to get a basic concept between the difference of these two, there are basically three basic individuals involved in a trust. The trustor, the Trustee, and the beneficiary. The easiest way to understand this is by illustration. Trustor-------------------->Trustee----------------------->Beneficiary gives $ or property manages $ or property receives $ or use of property As an example, Anne (trustor or donor) wants to give $100,000 to her daughter Marie (the beneficiary), but does not want her to have access all of the money at once. Therefore, she gives the money to Hillary (the trustee) and tells her to only pay her daughter Marie 10,000 per year, over the next ten years. Now there would of course be other variables within this example such as management fees the trustor would charge, as well as accrued interest since the money would be held in a trust fund, but I'm trying to give a simple answer to a simple question.
A trustor and trustee are two different entities. A trustor is the entity that executes a Declaration of Trust that includes all the provisions that govern the trust. The trustee is the entity or person who is appointed to manage the trust property. There should be a provision in the trust that provides instructions for the appointment of a successor trustee.
A trustee and a beneficiary are essential to a trust. Without a trustee and a beneficiary there is no valid trust. They should not be the same person.
If there is (1) more than one trustee; and, (2) the trustee-beneficiary cannot act as trustee unilaterally; and (3) the other trustee is not a beneficiary of the trust, yes. If the the trustee is also designated the beneficiary, the trust fails as illusory.
A trust is established by a Declaration of Trust. The trustee is the person appointed to hold title to and manage the trust property. The declaration contains all the powers of the trustee and the provisions of the trust. You must review it to determine if and how the trustee can be terminated and a new trustee appointed.
Yes, it is possible to be the sole trustee and sole beneficiary of a trust.
No. The trustee has full control over the assets in the trust. In a 'blind trust' the trustee must be completely independent. If the beneficiary is the trustee then the trustee is not completely independent.