There is nothing wrong with concealed weapons Carry as long as you follow the local laws. Most states will require you to obtain a permit to carry concealed which will require some sort of safety training. As long as have the training and know your local laws, there should be no problem.
Yes, you can carry a concealed weapon with a permit in a Florida restaurant unless the restaurant explicitly prohibits it. However, it is always a good idea to check the specific laws and regulations of the restaurant or establishment before carrying your concealed weapon inside.
Records are at State Level. There is no National registry. A good guess is about 35-40 million
In the state of Minnesota, it is illegal for civilians to carry an expandable baton. According to Minnesota Statute 624.714, possession of a dangerous weapon, including expandable batons, is prohibited unless specifically authorized by law. Only law enforcement officers or individuals with a valid permit to carry a handgun are allowed to possess such weapons in Minnesota. It is important to be aware of and comply with state laws regarding weapon possession to avoid legal consequences.
I just bought one for $125 in mint condition, although I have seen them as high as $200, It is a very simple gun but a great concealed carry weapon.
Only armed security guards employed by the casino and armed armored truck service emplyees are allowed to do this.Don't even try it . Casino security is tight, good , and not too gentle.
Well, very simply, it allows people who would otherwise not have a good option to defend themselves, to carry a handgun for self defense. For some unbelieveably inane reason, people seem to think that making it illegal to own or carry a gun will somehow keep criminals from owning or carrying guns for criminal purposes.
It depends on the circumstances. Does she want a handgun or some other type of weapon? Where is she located?
Please define "permit". Do you mean to own, or to carry concealed? Good questions give good answers.
Not concealed without a permit & not without a good reason. Brandishing is a crime in most states & they are supposed to be in a lock box when taken to the range.
Your are asking for an opinion. There are several revolvers that would fill this role well- in my personal opinion, the Smith & Wesson Mdl 60 revolver in .357 Magnum would be the revolver of choice. You may also want to look at the Ruger SP101, preferably, in a hammerless configuration if you want it for concealed carry.
No. The Homeland Security Act and PATRIOT Act had no effect on off-duty officers and firearms. The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, also known as HR 218, was signed into law in 2004. It permits, but does not require, full-time American law enforcement officers in good standing to carry concealed firearms throughout the United States, regardless of their home jurisdiction. Honorably retired officers with 15 years or more of full-time service can also carry their firearms concealed, so long as they pass an annual qualification test and carry proof of such qualification with them.
It's compact and reliable. The .380 ACP leaves a bit to be desired, but it can be used effectively. The exposed hammer could be a hindrance for inside-the-waistband carry, and the manual safety could be something to get hung up on (in contrast to a firearm like the Glock 26 or Kahr pistols). While I wouldn't consider it an ideal choice, it's still a fairly popular pick for concealed carry.