YES! Article 4 section 1 of the constitution
Interesting question, as each state has its own laws in this regard and may not honor the ruling of another state.
No. A contempt of a court order complaint must be filed in the court that has jurisdiction over that case. Another judge at another court cannot issue a ruling on that case.
Whether or not a local or state law - or a ruling by a State court - is at odds with the Constitution of the US.
supremacy clause
Typically, a judge in family court does not have the authority to reverse a ruling made in civil court. Family court has its own jurisdiction over specific family-related matters such as divorce, child custody, and support. If a ruling has been made in civil court, it would generally have to be appealed to a higher court rather than being reversed by a judge in family court.
It depends on the court's ruling.
Although law professionals will tell you it is a separate system, it is not. The US Supreme court has ruled that these systems are separate in so much as they are bound by the State constitution, and the Federal constitutions as well as the rulings of the US Supreme Court. State courts cannot divert from a Federal Court ruling; if they do the US Federal Court system will overturn the ruling.
no
Any trial court, federal or state, has the power to make a ruling like this. The rulings are always subject to appeal up through to the state or Federal Supreme Court. Even a state court ruling on the issue may be taken to the US Supreme Court.
The original ruling was in 1997 (DeRolph v. State of Ohio) In 2000, 2001, and 2002, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled again that the school-funding process in Ohio remained unconstitutional. Thus far, the state legislature has ignored the Ohio Supreme Court's ruling.
The full faith and credit clause of the U.S. Constitution requires every state to honor the laws and court decisions of every other state.
The Supreme Court provides final rulings on the constitutionality of state and local laws.