On balance, a federal system provides the U.S. with a superior form of government due to its ability to balance power between national and state authorities, allowing for localized decision-making that can better reflect the diverse needs of different regions. This structure promotes innovation through state-level experimentation and enables citizens to engage more directly with their local governments. However, it can also lead to inconsistencies in policies and services across states, which may create challenges in areas like civil rights and public health. Overall, the benefits of local governance and flexibility tend to outweigh the drawbacks.
Each of the 3 branches has it's own powers and responsibilities. None is superior to the others.
supremacy clauseconstitution
the balance of power between federal and state governments was restored NOVANET
the balance of power between federal and state governments was restored NOVANET
No. Supreme Court justices (Judicial Branch) and US Senators (Legislative Branch) work in separate, independent parts of the federal government, and neither is inferior nor superior to the other. They have completely different chains of command.
It shifted the balance of power from the individual states to the federal government.
Obviously not enough to balance the budget.
Separation of powers
Separation of powers
Separation of powers
Interdependence and federal government's superior taxing powers have increased role for the national government at the state level. Most of the programs at state level now depend on federal funding, giving national government unprecedented leverage in the states. Now federal government is taking active role in issues like education and social welfare, which were traditionally in the state domain. Role of the national government has also increased in the areas of security and surveillance after the September 11 attacks.
When did the balance of power in the U.S. federal system shift in favor of the national government having more power?