Only if the pagan clergyperson (Shaman/Wiccan/Druid/whatever) is licensed by the state to conduct marriage ceremonies.
If the marriage between the Jamaicans was done according to Jamaican law then yes the marriage is legally binding in the United States as well.
A legally binding document is one whose terms can be enforced by a court of law. An example is a marriage certificate and a contract.
Since a common law marriage is a legally binding marriage in Texas, she would have the same rights and restrictions as any other wife.
Muslim marriages are not legally recognised in UK law but marriage in Gambia by 'justices' is legally binding in the UK. However if you are already legally married in the UK then you shouldn't marry another person of any religion until you are legally divorced - it would be fraudulent if not bigamism.
Yes, after 7 years you are considered common law. However communal marriage as it is refered to is not a legally binding contract such as marriage is. If you have behaved and presented yourselves to others as husband and wife, that may be a factor in creating a common law marriage that would be binding. You should talk to an attorney practicing family law in your state to be sure.
Arkansas (along with most states) does not recognize common law marriage. The only exception to that would be if you previously lived in another state that did recognize common law marriage (again, most states don't) and you were considered common law married in that state, and you then later moved to Arkansas.
An email or in fact verbal communication can be legally binding in a court of law. If the email is specific and clear, they could be held legally liable in a court of law.
No, common law marriage is not legally recognized in Texas.
no she is not but donk go bonking her
No. In a common law marriage you are considered legally married and married people can not legally marry others.
If your marriage is legally recognized in your jurisdiction then you need to obtain a divorce to legally end it.
There is no reason why a text message 'contract' should not be legally binding, however there have not been any precedent setting cases on the issue.