I have no idea what this is even asking.
In a civil case, the plaintiff is the party who starts the proceedings by filing a complaint against the defendant.
A default judgment in a civil case is a ruling made in favor of one party because the other party failed to respond or appear in court. It impacts the legal proceedings by allowing the case to proceed without the absent party's participation, potentially leading to a final decision in favor of the party who obtained the default judgment.
To achieve official party status in the House of Commons of Canada, a political party must have at least 12 elected Members of Parliament (MPs). This status grants the party certain privileges, including access to additional funding and resources, as well as a designated area in the House. Official party status is significant for increasing a party's visibility and influence in parliamentary proceedings.
In a civil case, the status "no order" typically means that the court has not issued any formal orders or rulings regarding the case at that point in time. This status may indicate that the case is still in the preliminary stages, awaiting further action from either party or the court. It can also suggest that no motions have been resolved or that the case is pending additional proceedings. Essentially, it reflects a lack of substantive decisions made by the court.
Short answer- yes, statements made in judicial proceedings are completely privileged.
Party, Class, Status
No, it is generally not permissible to use illegally obtained evidence in civil court proceedings.
The party who initiates a legal case is known as the plaintiff in a civil case or the prosecution in a criminal case. They are the ones bringing the case to court and seeking a resolution or remedy for the legal issue at hand.
A simple answer might be: After "litigation" (loose definition: "legal wrangling") in both civil and criminal proceedings - usually one party is the 'winner' and the other party is the 'loser.' Occasionally a case can be "dropped" or "dismissed."
Criminal contempt involves willful disobedience of a court order that disrupts the court's proceedings, while civil contempt involves failure to comply with a court order to benefit the opposing party in a civil case.
It is possible for one party to be absent for proceedings. However, in most cases, the party is usually the accused commonly referred to as the defendant. The prosecutor will often be present.
Yes, it is possible to subpoena text messages in a civil case. This means that a party in the case can request the text messages from a person's phone or from a phone service provider as part of the legal proceedings.