Misconduct records are regulated differently between states--in many states they aren't regulated at all. The vast majority of chiefs and sheriffs consider these documents part of an employee's personnel record and shield them from public disclosure.
Disclosing misconduct records becomes something of a balancing task between competing rights and needs. Anecdotally, most misconduct committed by law enforcement officers is comprised of minor infractions (tardiness, discourtesy, etc.) rather than egregious acts of brutality or corruption. The public argues they have a right to know while the police officer argues personal privacy. The chief desires to protect the identities of witnesses (police and civilian) to ensure their candidness. (Police coworkers might fear ostracizing while private citizens might fear retaliation.) The chief wants to encourage people to come forward with their complaints and knowledge about misconduct, but many people won't cooperate if their identity or the content of their statement is disclosed. So unless a a judge has ordered the records' disclosure or the chief has signed a consent decree (or such records are specifically open under your state's laws) it is likely they aren't available as a public record. However, this is not accurate regarding New Jersey law. New Jersey's Open Public Records Act allows many police discipline reports and records to be available to the public. If you are refused these records, the law provides the municipality must pay your attorney fees if must sue get them. Florida also has very broad public records access laws. Bottom line is you need to contact your local bar association and find a lawyer specializing in public records or civil rights matters.
Yes, police records are generally considered public information, but there are exceptions for certain sensitive or confidential information.
Yes, police records are generally available to the public, but the specific information that can be accessed may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the type of record requested.
Yes phone books are public , but phone records..are not.Phone records would be calls in and out from specific phone numbers.The police have access to that information.
Yes, it is possible to access police interrogation records through a public records request. However, whether police interrogations are considered public record can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances of the case. In some cases, certain parts of the interrogation may be redacted or withheld to protect sensitive information or ongoing investigations.
Yes
if police behave misconduct you should go to the commissioner office and send your complaint. They take action against them.
Knowing that what they are about to do is wrong, and then doing it anyway. That will be misconduct of a criminal nature by an officer.
You don''t that is in the domain of the police authorities and is not public knowledge
No. Generally speaking, except for what may be revealed in a subsequent trial, police investigations are NOT public records.
In Australia to the Crime and Misconduct Commission
mike beebee
Punishment for police misconduct are not the same for the punishment a citizen would receive in the same scenarios. Most police misconduct is often deemed justifiable as in self defense. Officers are put on paid leave or desk duties. Few have been punished with termination and or imprisonment.