According to the Constitution, any powers not already given to the federal government are reserved by the individual states. You would have to see if the Constitution can be interpreted in such a way that medical research using animals is covered by any of its provisions.
No.
cause animals differ from humans and they have different abilities and their abilities are based on their medical research
mostly medical research.
no!
They used animals to study body functions
They used animals to study body functions
The National Institutes of Heath (NIH) is the federal agency responsible for promoting medical research. 80% of their funding is distributed in the form of research grants.
The National Institutes of Heath (NIH) is the federal agency responsible for promoting medical research. 80% of their funding is distributed in the form of research grants.
As a religion we dislike the use of animals. But individual views differ.
The American Medical Association (AMA) condones the use of animals in biomedical research. Oftentimes, there is no choice but to test on animals, since testing on humans is considered unethical.
Yes, but if necessary for mankind benefit,
Animals should not be used for drug development or medical research for the following reasons: Animals are killed and kept in captivity for the extent of their lives. A lot of the things tested on animals are never even used. It is expensive to keep animals alive for the sole purpose of testing drugs and other devices on them. Animals and humans are not the same.