Management should be made aware of the situation.
When an employee needs to buy something quick they can use petty cash. For example, if an employee made a quick trip to get some donuts for the people in the office they would just take from the petty cash on hand.
Custody of petty cash in a company should ideally be assigned to a trusted employee, typically in the finance or administrative department, who is responsible for managing and tracking the funds. This individual should have clear guidelines for usage, along with a system for documenting transactions to ensure accountability. Regular audits and reconciliations should be conducted to prevent misuse and maintain financial integrity. It's also advisable to have a secondary approval process for larger petty cash disbursements.
You should not be arguing over such a petty thing.
Two people should sign a completed petty cash voucher if they are removing funds from a mutually protected petty cash supply for which they are both in charge. This will enable both parties to be responsible for one another during the transaction.
No. It is worse than petty. That would be selfish and mean-spirited.
Yes
Pedantic
Debit employee expensesCredit cashDebit payrollCredit cash (balance amount)credit employee expense
Richard Petty won 200 Nascar races during his career.
True. To maintain proper internal controls and prevent potential fraud, petty cash reimbursement checks should ideally be cashed by someone other than the accounts payable clerk. This separation of duties helps ensure accountability and reduces the risk of errors or unauthorized transactions.
The answer to this question cannot be known."Bonding" of an employee is done by independent insurance companies that issue such 'bonds.' What criteria they, or your employer, use to screen an employee is entirely up to them.
yes. the entry should be: petty cash fund debit cash in bank credit