Only their God, or Supreme Being (if they believe in one) can pass that judgment on them.
Only if they feel they should be.
Generally speaking, we are not. We are, however, usually responsible for the actions of our children, and possibly for people in our care.
This claim is a moral claim, suggesting that it is morally wrong to choose not to vote. It pertains to ethics and the principles individuals believe should guide their actions in society.
There actions may well be construed as war crimes and should be dealt with by the military.
Yes, teenagers should be held responsible for their actions, but within a framework that considers their age and developmental stage. Providing guidance, support, and appropriate consequences can help teenagers learn from their mistakes and grow into responsible adults.
One should only be responsible for one's own actions so the answer is "NO".
Canada should deal with their war criminals by arresting them.
This is a controversial topic with arguments on both sides. Some believe that all citizens should have the right to vote, regardless of their past actions. Others argue that criminals have violated the social contract and should have their voting rights revoked as part of their punishment.
War criminals should be punished according to the crimes they have committed.
no
The Abolitionists thought that slavery was morally wrong and should be ended.
Each person should be held responsible and accountable for their actions to the extent and parameters of a) comprehension b) intention and c) ability to repeat the action.
Ethics in involuntary actions refer to the moral considerations surrounding behaviors that occur without conscious choice or intention, such as reflexes, unconscious habits, or automatic responses. These actions raise questions about accountability, responsibility, and the implications of intent in moral judgments. For instance, if a person accidentally causes harm due to an involuntary action, ethical discussions may focus on whether they should be held morally responsible. Such considerations are important in fields like law, psychology, and philosophy, where the nature of human agency is critically examined.