If the perpetrator was found guilty -but- at the same time was also found mentally incompetent to understand the consequences of their action, it is EXTREMELY unlikely that they would have received the death penalty. DISCUSSION: The KEY to the matter is; "Was the 'mental illness' severe enough to impair their reasoining to the point that they did not understand the consequences of their actions?" If the perpetrator was suffering from only a 'lower level' mental problem but still was found competent to understand his actions, then, yes, under those circumstances they could receive a sentence of death.
Define mentally "HANDICAPPED." If they were found not guilty of a capital crime by reason of insanity they cannot be executed, but they may be institutionalized in a secure mental facility for their sentence.
The pupose of the "guilty but mentally ill" verdict is to
you should not feel guilty because you do not know if they really like you.You just THINK they like you.
She was found guilty after the trial and was executed.
King Louis XVI of France was executed on January 21, 1793, after being found guilty of treason.
It is widely believed that Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were guilty of espionage. They were convicted and executed for aiding the Russians.
Michigan
He is executed because the drum head court found him guilty
Hussein was found guilty by an Iraq tribunal was executed by hanging.
So what, then? Unless you are guilty you should run for your life.
If you are planning to kill someone, you will be guilty if you do; if you have killed someone, you are guilty. actually killing somebody is guilty if you have no reason if you have a reason to kill somebody then it would ether have to be a vendetta, or a family tradition if you have a reason besides that then u would feel guilty
Casey Anthony could have faced the death penalty if found guilty. However, she was found not guilty by a jury on July 5, 2011.