Imprisoning only violent offenders could lead to a more effective criminal justice system by focusing resources on those who pose a direct threat to public safety. However, this approach must also consider the societal factors contributing to crime, such as substance abuse and mental health issues. Alternatives to imprisonment, like rehabilitation and restorative justice, could be more beneficial for non-violent offenders. Ultimately, a balanced approach that addresses the root causes of crime while ensuring public safety may be the most effective solution.
utilitarian
utilitarian
It is illegal for private individuals to own 'stingers' in the UK- only the police are permitted to use Tazers to temporarily disempower violent offenders so that they can restrain them with handcuffs.
prison should not feel like stone walls, okay. WRONG.Madie- It means that you can imprison yourself without being inside an actual prison. For example: someone can imprison their mind, and they only think in specific subjects.
The only thing I can think of is "incarcerate".
Of the murderers released about 15% commit another murder, 30% another violent offence and abou 50% will go back to prison for some offence including parole violations,(Note that these are US figures only, not global figures)
You should never whip your kids. It only teaches them to be violent and scared of whoever whips them.
Violent behavior is never the answer, as it only leads to harm and destruction.
Only some men are violent in the home. most are not.
Because the police are part of the Executive Branch of government which only ENFORCES the law, and not part of the Judicial Branch which judges the offenders.
Only the most violent volcanic eruptions feature a pyroclastic flow.
no it is not violent it only has some parts where you ram cars