Mapp rule
No, evidence illegally seized by the police cannot be used in a trial due to the exclusionary rule, which prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of a person's constitutional rights.
exclusionary
Pornographic material inside a suitcase
Military leaders illegally seized power and dominated the Roman Republic.
Military leaders illegally seized power and dominated the Roman Republic.
military leaders illegally seized power and dominated the Roman Republic
You cannot. The money was seized as evidence of the offence, and after court action it is forfeited to the government as the "proceeds of crime."
Illegally seized evidence may not be used in a trial due to the exclusionary rule, which prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights, particularly the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Allowing such evidence would undermine the integrity of the judicial system and potentially encourage law enforcement to disregard constitutional protections. This principle aims to deter unlawful police conduct and ensure fair trial standards.
no tyrants seized power illegally
searches and seizures like 3rd amend. protect of privacy (general search warrents) evidence seized illegally without a search warrant may not be used in court.
The question doesn't include enough information. "Seized" by who (what agency) for what reason (evidence - forfeiture - safekeeping - etc) ? If it was seized as contraband and seized for forfeiture it will become the property of whatever agency that seized it. If it was seized as evidence of a crime, it will be returned to the victim/complainant after the trial is over.
More information is needed in order to answer. If the property was seized as "contraband" or "evidence" or it had something to do with the transportation of narcotics, you probably cannot regain it, it is forfeited to the government.