James Kelly has recently surfaced as a Ripper suspect. Unfortuneatly, when suspects are investigated for these crimes the person investigating relies on previous inaccuracies which in turn makes for faulty conclusions. James Kelly is one such suspect. Jack The Ripper's crimes did not stop after the murder of Mary Kelly in November 1888, and in all likelyhood Mary Ann Nichols was not the first victim. The detectives that worked the case were well aware of these facts. As time goes on many of these inaccuracies are taken as fact making the truth that much harder to discern.
Mary Jane Kelly.
She was the 5th believed to have been killed by Jack the ripper. She turned to prostitution when her husband died in an explosion.
Mary Jane Kelly was killed on 9th November 1888 in Whitechapel by Jack the Ripper
He didn't. Jack The Ripper's crimes continued long after the murder of Mary Jane Kelly on November 9, 1888. Many believe the Ripper was still killing as late as 1891, and possibly after the turn of the 20th century.
Nobody knows who Jack the Ripper was.
For many years it was believed the Mary Kelly's murder on November 9, 1888, was Jack The Ripper's last murder. This simply is not true. A prostitute named Francis Coles was murdered in Whitechapel in 1891 who is now also thought to be killed by JTR. It is also most likely that Mary Ann 'Polly' Nichols was not the Ripper's first victim. At the very least Martha Tabram, who was found murdered several weeks before Nichols, was the Ripper's also. If this is true than Kelly would have been the Ripper's sixth victim, not the fifth.
jack the ripper made his crimes in whitechapel London
He's not. Jack The Ripper was never identified.
No one was never apprehended as the Jack the ripper.
toon into casebook jack the ripper and you will get a lot of information.
Jack the ripper is dead his identity remains unknown to this day.
Jack the ripper according to records he existed