yes it has he took his case to court once more like 10 years later.
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
The United States won, as Fred Korematsu was not granted his appeal and was sent to an internment camp, and none of the Japanese-American's cases were looked into. This fool has no idea what he is talking about... he was not even close to knowing what really happened with Fred Korematsu. Korematsu won this as some would say "battle" against the United States. Fred Korematsu did not have to go to the internment camp.
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
Fred Korematsu's birth name is Fred Toyosaburo Korematsu.
13th amendment to the Constitution
No. Reversed means the verdict is "un-done". Remanded means it is sent back down to the lower court for a new decision.
A Supreme Court decision can be reversed through a process called "overruling," where the Court issues a new decision that contradicts or overturns the previous decision. This can happen if the Court's composition changes, new legal arguments are presented, or societal values shift.
yes. take the alcohol prohibition for example.
I can't be sure without more information, but best guess is that Whatever Government Agency or Department you are dealing with made some sort of decision. Somehow that first decision came under review, either because you appealed it or contested it in some way, or because of some internal policy. Regardless after a review of the initial decision was reviewed, it was reversed. That means it was overturned; ie that the opposite of that decision is now in effect. If they first said "yes" reversed means "no". If they first said "no," reversed means "yes".
It is Korematsu v US and was a landmark Supreme Court decision allowing the USA government to place Japanese Americans in internment camps during WWII.
The case is re-tried, or perhaps (at the option of the prosecution) the charges may be dropped or reduced.
The Maryland Court of Appeals decision was reversed.