When formulating expert witness questions for a trial, it is important to consider the relevance of the questions to the case, the qualifications and expertise of the witness, the clarity and specificity of the questions, and the potential impact of the answers on the outcome of the trial. It is also important to avoid leading questions and to ensure that the questions are phrased in a way that is easily understood by the judge and jury.
Yes, a lawyer can serve as a witness in a legal proceeding, but there are limitations and ethical considerations that may apply.
Yes, an attorney can testify as a witness in a court case, but there are limitations and ethical considerations that may apply.
Yes, a judge can ask a witness questions during a court proceeding.
A grand jury witness can expect to answer questions from the prosecutor and defense attorney. They may also have to answer questions from the judge.
An examiner can ask leading questions of a hostile witness because he is seeking answers to questions this person is unwilling to give voluntarily. However, this can only be done on cross-examination. Asking leading questions on direct examination is considered "coaching" the witness to provide a certain answer.
When an attorney questions their own witness during a trial, it is called "direct examination." This process allows the attorney to present the witness's testimony to support their case and establish facts. During direct examination, leading questions are generally not permitted, as the goal is to allow the witness to provide their account in their own words.
If the witness is a Prosecution Witness - the Prosecutor's initial questioning of their own witness is referred to as direct examination.If, after the defense asks that witness questions (known as cross examination), the prosecutor feels the need to re-question their witness again (to clarify certain matters) that is called re-direct examination.
Yes, a witness in a civil case can refuse to answer questions by invoking their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
Cross-examination. They will ask the witness questions that seek to discredit the opposition's case.
Cross-examination. They will ask the witness questions that seek to discredit the opposition's case.
create doubt in the juries mind . . .Added: . . . . and impeach the witness if possible.
create doubt in the juries mind . . .Added: . . . . and impeach the witness if possible.