The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a fair and speedy trial by an impartial jury, the right to be informed of the charges against you, the right to confront witnesses against you, and the right to have a lawyer represent you.
The amendment that limits the amount of terms for a person to have only two four-year terms as president in office.
The difference between the sixth and seventh amendment is that the seventh amendment offers civil jury. That means back then it didnt matter if you were black or white, you deserve an equal trial. In the sixth, it doesn't say anything about civil so that means it doesn't matter if its civil or not.
"in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy a public trial, by an impartial jury by fire"
The 6th Amendment guarantees the right to a fair and speedy trial by an impartial jury, the right to be informed of the charges against you, the right to confront witnesses against you, and the right to have a lawyer represent you.
sixth .
Sixth.
The Miranda Rights decision stated that a person is denied of their Constitutional Rights if they are not informed of such rights when they are arrested. Therefore, it allows the arrested to know that they have the right to remain silent (Fifth Amendment), that anything they say can and will be used against them in the court of law, that they have the right to an attorney (Sixth Amendment), and that if they cannot afford an attorney they will be appointed one by the state (Sixth Amendment).
The 11th amendment protects a state from lawsuits filed by citizens of other states or countries. Example: A Californian can't sue Florida.
Although people generally BELIEVE this is in the Constitution of the US, it does not say specifically that you are entitled to a trial by "a jury of your peers."What it DOES say (in the Sixth Amendment) is that you are guaranteed the right to "a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed."
There's a lot, but I'd say a bookworm.
The 22nd amendment says that no one can be elected President more than twice, and anyone who has served more than 2 years of someone else's term as President can only be elected to one full term.
How many more amendments will it take? Aren't five enough? If we revise the fifth amendment will it be the sixth amendment? What will then be the fifth amendment? The fourth? Let's just stick with the fifth amendment we've got. That's what I say. Second opinion: The fifth amendment is fine just the way it is, and the way it has been interpreted under Miranda. If you think it should be revised, contact your congressman/woman or senator and ask that it be changed. p.s. There are 27 amendments right now. If the fifth amendment were changed, it would become the 28th.