To establish a prima facie speed violation, evidence such as radar readings, speedometer calibration records, and witness statements may be required. This evidence must demonstrate that the driver was exceeding the posted speed limit.
Elements that are prima facie are those that appear to be true or valid at first sight or on initial examination. These elements are presumed to be accurate until proven otherwise. In legal contexts, prima facie evidence or elements can establish a fact or case unless rebutted by further evidence.
Res ipsa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself), a doctrine in tort law, can establish a prima facie (evidence that sustains a judgment in the absence of contradictory evidence) case. It is not clear what you are asking in your question about "inland disputes" (definition?).
"Unable to present a prima facie case" refers to a situation in which a party fails to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims at an initial stage of a legal proceeding. A prima facie case means that the evidence presented is adequate to establish a fact or raise a presumption unless disproven. If a party is unable to meet this burden, the court may dismiss the case or specific claims without requiring the opposing party to present their defense. Essentially, it indicates that the evidence is insufficient to warrant further proceedings.
Of course. A prima facie case is one which is established by sufficient evidence to prove guilt and can be overthrown only by rebutting evidence produced by the other side.
monopoly
In some cases yes
Oligopoly
yes it is
Yes. The term "prima facie" means "first view" or "immediately apparent"- it refers to evidence that directly suggests a factual connection, such as the guilt of the accused.
Prima facie is a Latin term meaning "at first look," or "on its face," and refers to the evidence gathered before trial which is sufficient to prove the case unless substantial contradictory evidence is shown at trial.Actually the term is fairly commonly used in many endeavors outside the court and law. Someone describing something as "Prima Facie" usually means the matter is a "slam-dunk."
It means "at first sight or "first view." As a legal term "prima facie" means "immediately apparent"- it refers to evidence that directly suggests a factual connection, such as the guilt of the accused. This evidence may be rebutted and in some cases could yield an erroneous conclusion.
What do you mean by prima facie evidence? A prosecutor is free to enter into a plea agreement at any point during a criminal case. He or she is also ethically required not to charge a case against an individual unless they feel that they can prove that case beyond a reasonable doubt to begin with. That's not to say that there isn't such a thing as a unethical prosecutor that would charge a case on very little evidence. However that is a rarity. A prosecutor ethically is also required not to prosecute a case unless they believe that person to be guilty it is not simply to secure convictions. There is no such thing as an amount of evidence that is required for a plea negotiation. However, if a prosecutor is being ethical about it there will almost always be some evidence to suggest the accussed's guilt.