If the President had the power to fire Supreme Court justices for disagreeing with their rulings, it could undermine the independence of the judiciary and threaten the system of checks and balances in the government. This could lead to a concentration of power in the executive branch and potentially erode the principles of democracy and the rule of law.
Idk 😐
There are currently 9 Supreme Court Justices, so for there to be a majority ruling, 5 would have to rule a certain way.
For a majority ruling on the Supreme Court, a minimum of five out of the nine justices must agree. This is because a majority decision requires more than half of the justices to support a particular outcome or opinion. It is necessary to have a majority in order to establish a binding decision for the Court.
The agreed ruling of more than half of the Supreme Court justices is called a majority decision.
Justices have an option to dissent from a ruling issued by a majority of the Supreme Court
If a Supreme Court justice disagrees with a ruling of the court, they would typically write a dissenting opinion. This opinion outlines their reasons for disagreeing with the majority's decision, often highlighting legal principles, precedents, and alternative interpretations of the law. Dissenting opinions can influence future cases and provide a counterargument that may resonate with later courts or justices.
Ever hear the term "checks and balances"? One of the checks (limits) on the power of the President is that he cannot do what you describe. This means that once appointed the members of the Supreme Court can consider laws and cases without outside influence.
The agreed ruling of more than half of the Supreme Court justices is called a majority decision; the written document is called a majority opinion or the "opinion of the Court."
The Supreme Court's ruling is final and cannot be appealed. The United States Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices.
In the United States, the highest court in the land is the Supreme Court. It has the ultimate authority in interpreting the Constitution and federal law. The Supreme Court consists of nine justices who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Its decisions can only be overturned by a constitutional amendment or by a subsequent Supreme Court ruling.
This would essentially put the supreme court under the president and let him decide the constitutionality of laws if Congress agreed with him. However if the opposition controlled Congress, the president might fire the whole court and Congress might refuse to confirm his new appointments and chaos would result.
This would essentially put the supreme court under the president and let him decide the constitutionality of laws if Congress agreed with him. However if the opposition controlled Congress, the president might fire the whole court and Congress might refuse to confirm his new appointments and chaos would result.